DECONSTRUCTING TIME: This blog is about the human experience and perception of time from the Paleolithic era to today. Most blogs can be viewed and downloaded as PDF files at the academic site --- https://unc.academia.edu/RickDoble/Drafts --- All photos: commons.wikimedia.org unless noted. All blog posts are licensed under the Creative Commons copyright license Attribution CC BY -- you may use what you choose as long as you credit this blog and the author Rick Doble.
ABSTRACT: I am suggesting that the term 'basket weaving' be replaced with the term 'woven-fiber technology' when talking about baskets and fiber constructions in prehistory. I say this because the term 'basket weaving' may be outdated. While it once may have been a general term for all kinds of weaving that resulted in a wide variety of products, most people today think of it as meaning baskets only. Furthermore, while basket weaving was a technology and baskets could be thought of as tools and basketry was clearly an industry, none of these words are associated with Paleolithic or Neolithic basket weaving (see Google searches) although all these terms are used when discussing or researching stone tools from those periods. In the discipline of paleoanthropology, this becomes a serious problem as it tends to limit the scope of research and funding for research. I suggest that the term basket weaving should be replaced with a more inclusive term that also emphasizes that the weaving of fibers was a technology and an important one that may have begun early in the development of hominins. The term I suggest is 'woven-fiber technology'.
One of the greatest barriers to the acceptance of basket weaving as a key technology in the development and evolution of hominins is the lack of a good general terminology for the craft.
There are a number of reasons for this, some important and some even humorous. Here is a current definition of basket weaving:
The Lexico dictionary website, powered by Oxford Languages, had this definition:
bas·ket-weav·ing
noun
1. the art or activity of creating woven baskets.
2. HUMOROUS
used as the type of college course that is thought to be without any practical or professional value.
And it also had these examples about the humorous definition:
-- ‘If your transcript is filled with easy A's, such those as earned in classes like the fabled Basket-Weaving 101, you'll likely be ranked below a student who has a lower GPA comprised of courses in the hard sciences.’
-- ‘When I was in school, we called this kind of course Basket-Weaving 101 (actually, we did not have any courses this absurd, but some were almost as easy as this one seems to be).’
-- ‘So even though they fail a core class, they can still get an A in "basket-weaving 101" or "making balloon doggies" 102, and pass to the next grade.’
And let's not forget the famous fictitious college course we all laughed about: Underwater Basket Weaving. This "is an idiom referring pejoratively to supposedly useless or absurd college or university courses" (Wikipedia.org). There is even a full Wikipedia page on this:
But it gets even worse. I found the same glib references not only in the United States but also in England. In fact, you can view a complete tongue-in-cheek course outline (see next) for Underwater Basket Weaving from the University of Portsmouth, UK at this web address.
This picture, captured from a Portsmouth University (UK) joke syllabus, is classic British dry humor where there is almost no hint that this listing is for a class that does not exist and that it is about the well-known simple and pointless course in basket weaving.
The University of Central Arkansas went one step further and proposed an interdisciplinary major in Underwater Basket Weaving that was published in a student magazine.
Shinnie, Ferri. "New degree to be offered." The Vino 2003, Volume 21 - Issue 4.
All of these reflect and define a modern attitude toward the craft of basketry, i.e., it is seen as a simple unimportant lowly craft. The Encyclopedia Britannica at one point called it "humble and banal." https://www.britannica.com/art/basketry
The next painting, entitled Not Of the Fold, shows a family that was shunned as the father was reduced to the demeaning job of making baskets.
This painting is entitled, "Not Of the Fold" by Englishman Frederick Morgan and painted circa 1880. "Not Of the fold" is a British expression meaning that a person or family does not belong to a normal accepted society; 'the fold' means something similar to 'the flock' which is more common in American English.
In earlier times, baskets and basket weaving were highly valued. They were vital for the success of the first ancient civilizations of Egypt and Babylon, for example. But I believe that about 100 years ago when mass production became available, baskets were replaced by manufactured goods that were so inexpensive basketry's long-time value became lost.
In any case, these denigrating attitudes mean that basket weaving is often not taken seriously, especially in colleges and universities. Yet, as I have written many times in my articles, this is a major mistake because basket weaving may have been one of the crucial technologies that led to the survival, evolution, and eventual dominance of our species.
BASKET WEAVING AS AN IMPORTANT CRAFT
Nevertheless, there is another side to the story. Many museums around the world collect and proudly display basketry. The finest baskets can sell for a substantial amount of money and ancient Native American Indian baskets, considered to be the pinnacle of the craft and the art form, can sell for thousands of dollars.
Because just about every society in the world had a basket technology that was often unique to that culture, there are museums worldwide that collect these works. Next follows a list of only some of what is available.
Museums With Significant Basketry Collections
About 80 museums in the United States alone are listed
An ancient coiled basket From Egypt, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Asasif, East of Pabasa, Radim, Burial. Dated circa 2030 –1640 B.C., Middle Kingdom, Dynasty 13–17. Construction of Halfa grass and rush basketry. Metropolitan Museum of Art, NYC.
It should also be noted that, for at least the last 100 years, basket weaving has been used to teach mathematics, geometry, and structure to young people, from kindergarten to seniors in high school. And this still continues today. See my last blog-article for a listing of some of these programs.
Basket-Weaving Education and Its Cognitive Aspects
And finally, containers and baskets are considered a cultural universal [1] meaning that virtually every culture, every society, every farming community, and every hunter-gatherer tribe made containers and baskets. They were made with local plants, local weaving patterns, and with the traditions of their society for a variety of local purposes. This in itself testifies to the importance of basketry.
CHANGING THE WAY BASKET WEAVING IS PERCEIVED
I believe that the term 'basket weaving' is now outdated as a term for academic or archeological research and should be updated to reflect the fact that it is:
#1. A technology
#2. That a wide variety of objects, from small to large, have been created from a wide variety of fibers with a wide variety of techniques with almost limitless possibilities
#3. That this craft may have begun very early in hominid or hominin evolution
#4. That many baskets can be thought of as tools
#5. That there were/are many basket weaving industries
--------------------------------
FIXING THE PROBLEM #1:
THE TERM BASKET IS NOT INCLUSIVE
Let's start with the basic term 'basket weaving'. I believe that in the past, this may have referred to a general type of craft that included baskets but also many more items made with this type of technology such as mats or hats or fish traps, or even reed boats. It was the general name for a kind of technology that was not just confined to baskets.
So it may have once been a little like the current usage of the word 'horsepower'. When a person buys a car or boat or powerful engine that lists a horsepower number, no one thinks about horses.
Words and phrases in a language have a way of changing over time. Sometimes they gain a more general meaning and sometimes a more specific meaning. In the case of basket weaving today, most people think of it only as applying specifically to baskets and not as a general technology.
Historically this may have been different. The Sumerians of Mesopotamia, who were superb basket weavers, characterized the technology in this much more general way. In the Elementary Sumerian Glossary, a basket weaver was defined as:"a reed craftsman, basket, and mat weaver."[2]
"Though it would appear that basketry might best be defined as the art or craft of making baskets, the fact is that the name is one of those the limits of which seem increasingly imprecise the more one tries to grasp it. The category basket may include receptacles made of interwoven, rather rigid material, but it may also include pliant sacks made of a mesh indistinguishable from netting—or garments or pieces of furniture made of the same materials and using the same processes as classical basket making. In fact, neither function nor appearance nor material nor mode of construction are of themselves sufficient to delimit the field of what common sense nevertheless recognizes as basketry."
Called a mudhif or modhit, these large buildings, made entirely of reeds, were possible with basket weaving coiled construction.
"A mudhif, a traditional Marsh Arab guesthouse made entirely out of reeds. The Marsh Arab live a lifestyle that dates back 5,000 years." (Wikimedia.org)
Nevertheless in the modern world, we are stuck with the name baskets as meaning containers and not much else (see the Oxford definition above) even though in the past it may have applied to a huge variety of items from small to large, from sandals to large grass houses. So we need a new term that can include the wide range of products that were/are possible with basket technology.
--------------------------------
FIXING THE PROBLEM #2:
BASKET WEAVING IS(!) A TECHNOLOGY BUT IS NOT REGARDED AS SUCH
For some very odd reason basket weaving is generally not understood as a technology by historians or archaeologists. While Dr. Adovasio wrote a book about prehistoric basketry entitled Basket Technology [3], he is virtually the only academic who has made such a claim. And, at the same time, stone tool making is widely considered a technology. There is clearly some kind of disconnect here.
This picture is of a large reed boat at the harbor; it was constructed using coiled basket weaving techniques. This is a fanciful, but perhaps not inaccurate, painting of a ship at the port of Eridu, considered to be the oldest city of the first civilization of Sumer about 5000 years ago.
Even larger ships were constructed and were capable of carrying over 25 tons as shown by Thor Heyerdahl when he recreated such a boat, the Tigris, in 1978. ("The Tigris expedition: a National Geographic special" (documentary about Thor Heyerdahl's expedition). National Geographic Society, broadcast on PBS 04/01/1979.)
If you think I am exaggerating consider this: I did a Google search for these terms and here are the results:
GOOGLE SEARCHES (phrases searched in quotes)
SEARCH FOR TECHNOLOGY
Search = "prehistoric basket weaving technology"
No results found for "prehistoric basket weaving technology".
Search = "prehistoric basket technology"
No results found for "prehistoric basket technology".
Search = "paleolithic basket technology"
No results found for "paleolithic basket technology".
Search = "paleolithic baskets"
About 9 results (mostly from this blog).
BUT:
Search = "paleolithic stone tool technology"
About 4,900 results.
Search = "prehistoric stone tool technology"
About 6,410 results.
Search = "paleolithic stone tools"
About 23,400 results.
So while the word 'technology' does not seem to be associated with basket weaving, it is a technology, nevertheless. It involves a wide range of designs, materials, types of weave, sizes, and uses. This means a new terminology about the craft of basket weaving needs to include the word technology.
DOES BASKET WEAVING MEET THE CRITERIA FOR TECHNOLOGY? A Definition: Technology is "knowledge put into practical use to solve problems or invent useful tools." My comment: Such as applying an understanding of woven structure to create a number of containers and other items such as fish traps? https://www.britannica.com/technology/technology
Furthermore, there is the concept of tools. Even if we limit the discussion to containers, I believe that prehistoric hand-carried baskets were tools. Yet when I read about basketry, baskets are not often thought of as tools. But they were just that. A basket was a tool just as an Oldowan stone chopper or scrapper was a tool. Containers were/are essential and common to all cultures according to Dr. Donald Brown in his book Human Universals (1991) [4]. A basket was a tool to help gather food, for example. Or a basket container was a tool for storing food.
DOES BASKET WEAVING MEET THE CRITERIA FOR TOOL MAKING?
A main definition of tool:
"A handheld device that aids in accomplishing a task."
My comment: Such as a hand carried basket that is used to gather food and materials?
So the terms 'technology' and 'tool' are not associated with basket weaving. Because basket weaving has been locked out of these important concepts, this has sent a signal to academic scholars that this subject lacks a seal of approval that would justify serious study and funding. I believe that if these words began to be associated with basket weaving or woven-fiber technology it would spark interest among researchers, anthropologists, and archaeologists, and of course research grants, but especially young people who are deciding which path to follow.
But today this lack of respect for basketry and related technologies has meant that this subject matter has not been looked at very carefully by paleoanthropologists and archaeologists.
Speaking about the lack of archaeological interest in basketry, mats, and textiles, Grace M. Crowfoot wrote the following in A History of Technology, Volume 1. "In considering gaps in the knowledge of textiles, it must be remembered that there are vast areas where little archaeological study has been undertaken...Surviving pieces of rag were often rejected as without interest...Determination of the exact botanical origin of the fibres used in basketry and weaving has only quite recently been recognized as of archaeological importance."[5]
The words 'Technology', 'Tool' and 'Industry' are not normally associated with the term 'Basket Weaving' and yet Basket Weaving is all of these things and more.
--------------------------------
FIXING THE PROBLEM #3:
We need to get past the old world prehistoric technology categories, i.e., the three-age system of the Stone Age, the Bronze Age, and the Iron Age.
For almost three hundred years now, prehistoric technology has been characterized by the three-age system of the Stone Age, the Bronze Age, and the Iron Age which in a sense crowded out recognition of other technologies that might have occurred during these periods. Nevertheless, this three-age system has become entrenched. While these three ages are not incorrect, they should not be thought of as exclusive. A number of very old wooden spears and other items have been found from the Lower Paleolithic era, for example. And even well-preserved baskets and basket weaving items have been found from the New Stone Age or Neolithic time period.
Sophisticated basketry has been discovered from the Neolithic (New Stone Age) time period (see photo next) and impressions of advanced weaving have been found on clay fragments, dating back to 27,000 BP or the Upper Paleolithic (Old Stone Age) [6]. So in both cases, it has been clearly established that basket weaving technology existed alongside stone age tool technology and industries.
The Clacton Spear Point is believed to be the tip of a wooden spear. It was found in Clacton-on-Sea (UK) in 1911. It has been dated to 400,000 years old and is considered to be the oldest worked wooden implement that has been found.
Allington-Jones, L. "The Clacton Spear – The Last One Hundred Years." Archaeological Journal, 2015, pp. 172, 273–296.
Yet the labeling of prehistoric technology has been limited and defined by what archaeologists could find in quantity -- i.e., what had survived the ravages of time, meaning stone tools, bronze implements, and iron implements while basket and fiber materials had for the most part decayed.
Nevertheless, it was obvious to everyone that stone tools, for example, were only the tip of the iceberg.
"In whichever way archaeological remains are interpreted, one must always be aware that the vast majority of the materials with which prehistoric people were surrounded and with which they worked is lost to us today. ...organic materials start to decay as soon as they are deposited in the ground."[7]
There are two reasons, according to Jim Adovasio, we don’t think of baskets or textiles when we think of the Stone Age. One is that stones and bones, being far more durable, are far more common at archeological sites than artifacts made of fiber. But the other reason, says Adovasio, an archeologist at Mercyhurst College in Erie, Pennsylvania, is a bias on the part of archaeologists who study the era...Their emphasis has been on stone technology, large-animal hunting, and the accoutrements of machismo. Weaving isn’t as exciting as running around sticking things into mammoths.
Here is a definition of basketry from the Encyclopedia Britannica which I think is a good definition to work from.
Definition of basketry:
Basketry: art and craft of making interwoven objects, usually containers, from flexible vegetable fibres, such as twigs, grasses, osiers, bamboo, and rushes, or from...synthetic materials.
The following definition I have proposed contains keywords I would like to use. So I suggest the term:
Woven-Fiber Technology
You will see that these terms are mentioned in the Britannica definition plus I have added the word technology.
When talking about the technology of a specific era, that era should be specified, such as:
Paleolithic Woven-Fiber Technology
Neolithic Woven-Fiber Technology
Ancient Woven-Fiber Technology
I have suggested the term "woven-fiber technology" as a name because it is short, clear, descriptive, and inclusive of a wide variety of fiber constructions. And it gets away from any negative connotations about baskets.
It also conveys much more information given the limited way that baskets are understood today. A woven-fiber technology can include baskets from very small to very large but also mats, clothing, storage chests, furniture, textiles, sacks, fish traps, nets, fences, thatched roofs, and even large grass houses and reed boats as I have described.
CONCLUSION
My specific suggestion for the name 'woven-fiber technology' is not important. What is important is to settle on a new name that can include all kinds of fiber weaving and that is considered a technology.
A proper name and terminology are essential if research into the origins and development of basketry is to advance.
____________________________________
AFTERWORD ABOUT THE ESPARTO INDUSTRY
The word 'industry' should also apply to basket weaving and woven-fiber technology but like the words technology and tool, this word is not associated with basket making even though there have been many such industries across the globe at different times.
Weighing esparto grass in Tripoli, North Africa.
Furlong, Charles Wellington. The gateway to the Sahara; observations and experiences in Tripoli. New York, C. Scribner's sons, 1909, p. 226.
No results found for "paleolithic basket industry".
Search = "paleolithic stone tool industry"
About 2,180 results.
What follows is one example of a 7000-year-old major basket industry that continues to evolve in Spain and North Africa. It is very interesting to note that according one author (below), Neolithic basketry was of a higher standard than modern products, showing that basketry had reached a high point in the Neolithic era, 7000 years ago.
This is only one example of a basket weaving industry. There were many others such as the bamboo basket weaving industries of Asia, the reed basket weaving industries of Mesopotamia, and the papyrus basket weaving industry of ancient Egypt.
THE ESPARTO BASKET WEAVING INDUSTRY OF SPAIN & NORTH AFRICA
This is a map of where esparto grew naturally in Spain and North Africa.
This is an esparto canteen; the Spanish word for canteen is “calabaza” which is pre-Roman. This watertight esparto vessel is created with special tight weaves after curing the esparto grass for a month and then processing. Next it is sealed with pine tar that has to be carefully applied. This kind of canteen technology existed in Europe in prehistoric times and also with the hunter-gatherer Native North American Indians.
"Calabazas de esparto are an ancient part of the Spanish basketry and are part of the culture of Esparto, unique intangible heritage of the Western Mediterranean"
Anthropologist Dr. George P. Murdock who developed the Cross-Cultural Survey also lists weaving as one of the four basic universal technologies in all cultures
Murdock, George P. "The Common Denominator of Cultures." The Science of Man in the World Crisis, edited by Ralph Linton, New York: Columbia University Press; 1945: pp. 123-142.
[2] Foxvog, Daniel A. Elementary Sumerian Glossary.
University of California at Berkeley, revised 2008.
SumerianGlossaryFoxvog.pdf
[3] Adovasio,J. M. Basketry Technology: A Guide to Identification and Analysis, Updated Edition 1st Edition. Routledge; 1st edition (April 22, 2019).
[4] Brown, Human Universals, 1991.
[5] Charles Singer, E.J. Holmyard, A.R. Hall. A History of Technology, Volume I: From Early Times to Fall of Ancient Empires. Oxford University Press, 1954. (Kindle location = 8905)
[8] Rivera, Diego; Leopold, Susan; Verde, Alonso. "Traditional Craft Techniques of Esparto Grass (Stipa tenacissima L.) in Spain1." Article in Economic Botany, November 2015.
New Evidence Suggests That Basket Making May Have Begun 2 Million Years Ago
See the explanation below for more about this traditional water carrier.
ABSTRACT: Recent excavations at the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, Africa have revealed new information about some of the earliest hominins, probably Homo habilis, from 2 million years ago. For the purposes of this article, the main point is that these early humans walked 12 km or 7.5 miles to gather specific stones that they used for making Oldowan stone tools and for putting together a toolkit. And these specific stones made up the majority of stones found. They did this for several hundred thousand years. I argue that to do this, they probably had containers or early baskets to help them carry a large collection of stones back to their settlements, since walking that far would have been counterproductive if they only gathered a few stones. Next in this article, I show how very simple carriers could have been from natural plant materials, carriers that might have been like some of the earliest baskets.
An important archeological find has added hard evidence to the possibility that the origins of basketry may have begun 2 million years ago.
Recently archaeologists determined that some early hominins (probably Homo habilis), about 2 million years ago in the now famous Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, made the same type of Oldowan stone tools for hundreds of thousands of years, even though the environment changed radically during that time. And the archaeologists were able to determine that the stones that were used to make the tools were found far from the hominins' settlement.
A close examination of the tools revealed that these hominins chose their rocks carefully for different purposes and in doing so created a toolkit of various implements. And even more surprising, they walked 12 km (7.5 miles) from their camp to find specific kinds of quartzite. Moreover, they found the majority of these stones by traveling this far. All of this implies planning and it also implies a fairly sophisticated knowledge that was passed down from generation to generation.
So my observation is that if they were this smart, they probably made other things as well. And this is why early basketry or containers might be a part of the story. If they walked a distance to find certain stones, wouldn't they also have made some containers to carry the stones back?
LINKS AND QUOTATIONS ABOUT THE ARCHEOLOGICAL FIND
The findings were summed up in this way:
"Early hominins succeeded by being generalists with basic, versatile tools."
(Arstechnica.com, 2 Million Years Ago)
Read the summaries of this study
2-Million-Year-Old Stone Tools Unearthed in Tanzania
"The scientists also compared the chemical composition of the Ewass Oldupa tools [ED: the tools found in the excavation] and determined the MAJORITY [ED: my emphasis] of rocks used to make them had been obtained 12 km (7.5 miles) away from the site.
“This indicates planned behavior at an early stage in human evolution,” said co-author Julien Favreau, a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Anthropology at Mcmaster University."
(Sci-news.com, 2 Million Years Ago)
"The oldest evidence we have for early human relatives at Olduvai Gorge is a handful of stone tools, made and used around 2.03 million years ago.
"They seemed to choose different materials—in some cases as specific as choosing slightly different types of quartzite from different outcrops—for particular tools. (A study last year also suggested that the earliest toolmakers in our family tree knew enough to choose their materials wisely.)"
(Arstechnica.com, 2 Million Years Ago)
THE ORIGINS OF BASKETRY
If these early hominins were this smart, they could have woven containers out of leaves, vines, grasses, and branches since these were the most available materials. Or they could have made pouches out of animal skins or made a carrying device with gourd-like plants. Or they might have made these carriers with a combination of techniques.
Plus these containers or proto-baskets would have been part of the basic toolkit. They would have been one of the tools that worked alongside and complimented the other tools in the toolkit.
I believe that prehistoric containers or baskets were tools, yet when I read about basketry, in particular, it is not usually characterized as a technology and individual baskets are not often thought of as tools. But they were just that. A basket was a tool just as an Oldowan stone chopper or scrapper was a tool. Containers are essential and common to all cultures according to Dr. Donald Brown in his book Human Universals (1991).
In any case, these hominins needed a way to put together the many stones they had collected after walking 12 km and to carry them back when they made the return journey.
It is also important to note that the plants for making baskets would have changed as the environment changed. While the types of stones hominins looked for would have remained the same, the plant life varied. But, as is well known, baskets can be made from a wide variety of local plants, so continuing to make baskets with different plants would not have been out of the question for this young technology.
EARLY BASKET DESIGNS AND TECHNOLOGY
There are many things in nature that could have sparked the imagination of early hominins to make or weave baskets such as various bird nests, spider webs, or a tangle of plant growth which demonstrates how interwoven branches and vines can be quite strong and resilient.
As I wrote in an earlier article, there is fossil evidence of Oldowan stone tools and weaverbirds remains, birds that made elaborate woven basket-like nests, that were found together in the Bed I layer at Olduvai Gorge. These bird nests could have provided a model for early baskets.
Paleolithic Evidence Shows That Homo Habilis Could Have Learned Weaving From Weaverbirds (Ploceidae)
A weaverbird nest (left) and a random weave basket (right).
NOTE: While the earlier find is consistent with the same general time frame as that of this recent archeological find, i.e., 2 mya, it is in a different area of the Gorge. Bird fossils were found at the Ewass Oldupa site where this study was done but unfortunately I cannot determine if they included weaverbirds.
"The concentration of stone tools and animal fossils (wild cattle, pigs, hippos, panthers, lions, hyena, primates, reptiles, and birds) at the Ewass Oldupa site are evidence that both human and animal life centered around water sources."
(Sci-news.com, 2 Million Years Ago)
THE FIRST CONTAINERS/BASKETS?
While I believe that basic early basketry could have been learned based on observations by hominins of weaverbird nests, I also think that prior to that, simple proto-baskets could have been made. These baskets might have required only minutes to create and could probably have been made as needed while hunting or gathering. It may have only taken a few folds of large leaves, for example, or the intertwining of smaller leaves and branches to make a container.
"Traditional water container made from palm leaves from CamenaƧa / East Timor" (Commons.wikimedia.org)
This very simple water container (above) shows how easily a container or proto-basket could have been made.
View the next video that shows how to make a cup that holds water that is made from a flat sheet of printing paper. Making such a cup takes about a minute. Something like this could easily have been made by Homo habilis from a large leaf or several leaves or other plant materials. These could have been modified to work as carrying baskets with a handle or straps to carry on the back or to hang from the shoulder.
How To Make A Paper Cup That Holds Water (HD) (1.5-minute video)
This recent archeological excavation found that palm trees were part of the changing environment at one time. Palm leaves are especially useful for making simple fast woven-fiber items.
“Our research reveals that the geological, sedimentary and plant landscapes around Ewass Oldupa changed a lot, and quickly,” the researchers said.
“Yet humans kept coming back here to use local resources for over 200,000 years.
“They used a great diversity of habitats: fern meadows, woodland mosaics, naturally burned landscapes, lakeside PALM GROVES,[ED: my emphasis] steppes.”
(Sci-news.com, 2 Million Years Ago)
The next video shows how to make a very simple but more advanced basket and uses standard basket weaving techniques. It uses paper strips and takes about five minutes to create. This use of strips is similar to basket-weaving with palm leaves detailed next.
Paper Weaving Basket (4-minute video)
This basket is created like the palm leaf basket next.
This next how-to video shows how to make a 'primitive' traditional basket. It is based on the same principles as the paper basket in the video above. It is strong and durable but not complicated and only takes minutes to make.
How To Make A Primitive Basket (5-minute video)
A simple quick basket made from palm leaves.
Photo from the video of the finished basket.
Carrying basket of the Sherente people in Brazil. National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, Japan. Collected in 1977. (Commons.wikimedia.org)
A basket that uses the basic simple weaving method shown above.
So as basket-weaving developed, Hominins might have used strips of palm leaves or other such plant material to make similar items, since one of their changing environments included palm trees.
See the next set of pictures about karagumoy leaves in the Philippines that can be used to create strong but basic baskets. (Click on any picture to see the images as a 'slide show'.)
"Pandanus simplex is an economically important species of Pandanus (screwpine) (They are palm-like, dioecious trees) endemic to the Philippines. It is commonly known as karagumoy (also spelled karagomoy or karagomoi) or kalagimay. Its leaves and fibers are used widely in the Philippines for thatching, ropes, and weaving various traditional handicrafts like baskets and mats." (Wikipedia.com) (Commons.wikimedia.org)
CONCLUSION
But again, the key point is quite simple. Would these intelligent hominins spend a full day (round trip plus gathering) walking to a place 12 km away without having a container to help them carry back the stones that they had found? This does not seem likely.
So I believe this study now adds one more bit of evidence, to the many others I have written about in previous articles, that suggests that basketry may have begun quite early in the evolution of hominins.
Instead of the "Stone Age," it might be more appropriate to describe earlier eras of human existence as also being in the "Basket Age." When basketry started is, of course, up for debate. It might have been in the Upper Paleolithic or the Lower Paleolithic, for example.
In earlier articles, I have made the point that for about 100 years archeological authorities held that basket-weaving was not possible before 10 - 15 kya, i.e., it was a technology of Neolithic agricultural societies. These authorities felt that basket-making would have been too demanding and time consuming for earlier hunter-gatherer societies. So this idea effectively prevented any explorations into the possibility of basketry in the Paleolithic era, the era of hunter-gatherers. Now, finally, that barrier has been disproved and it is clear that basket making did happen in at least the Upper Paleolithic and possibly earlier. I have written about this in detail in my series of articles about basket-weaving.
However, the question still remains, how long ago did basketry begin? The current thinking is that it probably began in the earliest part of the Upper Paleolithic or perhaps 40 - 50 kya. Yet I believe it could have happened much earlier, i.e., 2-3 mya or millions of years ago. The key point is this: Now that we know that basket-weaving was not incompatible with a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and would have made a major survival difference, it could have begun with our earliest hunter-gatherer ancestors, Homo erectus or even Homo habilis.
We humans have been hunter-gatherers for millions of years while agriculture has been around for only 10-20 thousand years and civilization for a mere 5 thousand years. When human-like creatures were just getting a foothold on survival millions of years ago, basket technology would have proven invaluable. It would have enhanced the ability to gather plants, collect fish, and carry various materials, for example. Plus these people lived in the natural world of plants and fibers -- the materials needed to make baskets, so it seems logical that they would have made carrying devices.
The problem, of course, is that fibers decay and do not leave much evidence behind. But with modern forensics, we may be able to overcome this barrier such as looking at the microwear cutting patterns on Oldowan and Acheulean stone tools.
It is important to note that two well-respected anthropologists came up with a list of cultural universals, i.e., attributes common to all cultures, which included several things that were consistent with the idea that early cultures could have made baskets. George Murdock in the book, The Common Denominator of Cultures in The Science of Man in the World Crisis (Edited by Ralph Linton, New York: Columbia University Press; 1945: 123-142) listed weaving, tool-making, and ethno-botany as common to all cultures. Donald Brown in his book Human Universals (1991), listed tool and tool making, cordage, and containers.
In my past articles, I have listed over 20 facts that suggest basketry could have begun much earlier than previously thought.
And if it turns out that basketry was practiced millions or hundreds of thousands of years ago, we might need to revise our ideas about early human technology. As an article in Discovery Magazine suggested, we may want to rethink our categories. Instead of characterizing these early hominin time-periods as only belonging to the "Stone Age" it might make sense to think of them also as belonging to a "Basket Age."
ALSO FREE: The Illustrated Theory of Paleo Basket-Weaving Technology by Rick Doble Download a 200-Page PDF eBook -- no ads/no strings -- DOWNLOAD NOW Figshare Academia.edu
_________________________________
Footnotes
Arstechnica.com. Smith, Kiona, author. "This is how hominins adapted to a changing world 2 million years ago: Early hominins succeeded by being generalists with basic, versatile tools." January 8, 2021. Accessed January 12, 2021.