Showing posts with label neolithic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neolithic. Show all posts

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Students: Minor in Woven-Fiber Technology

 College students:
You can now minor in
the new field of
Woven-Fiber Technology
By Rick Doble
There is no college or university 
that offers a full degree in this field
Yet many colleges will let you self-design a minor as you wish



FROM BASKETS TO SHIPS:
IT MAY HAVE TAKEN 100s OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS
[TOP] A carry basket. using a simple design, made by the Xerente (Sherenté),
an indigenous people in Brazil.
It may have taken more than half a million years for the skills needed to make this basic basket [TOP] to evolve into the skills needed to make this seagoing ship [BOTTOM] made of reeds that could carry 50 tons of cargo and sail the Persian Gulf
[BOTTOM] "Model of the reed boat Tigris, boat of Thor Heyerdahl." 
This recreation of a Mesopotamian reed ship could carry 50 tons of cargo. Thor Heyerdahl built the full-scale ship to prove the seaworthiness of reed ships. He sailed the Tigris with no problems for 5 months in the Persian Gulf. 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tigris_Model_Pyramids_of_Guimar.jpg

Many colleges, particularly liberal arts institutions with open curricula, offer significant flexibility in choosing a minor, allowing students to tailor their studies to unique, interdisciplinary interests. 
GOOGLE AI  5/9/2026
Formerly known as basket weaving
Woven-Fiber Technology
greatly expands the definition of weaving
to suggest that it was a critical technology in the development of human tool-making and survival

This new field covers not only baskets that were made worldwide beginning thousands of years ago, but also textiles, clothing, and cordage,
along with hundreds of woven objects and structures that were made by hundreds of cultures all throughout history. And woven-fiber technology continues and is important today with clothing, for example. 

One clear example of the importance and widespread use of woven-fiber technology was the reed industry in early Mesopotamia, whose first cities in the world were built on reed technology with the production of large seafaring reed boats, fleets of small boats, huge buildings made entirely out of reeds, and tools to create and dredge canals along with reed devices that helped with irrigation and flood control. This is only one example, as woven-fiber technology was critical for Egypt, Greece, Rome, the Middle Ages in the west, and many other places in the East, such as India and China.

If you create a minor in Woven-Fiber Technology, you could be one of the first to tell an untold story of how woven-fiber technology was a key craft and technology that began thousands of years ago and continues to this day. With the power of the Internet, you can research woven-fiber technology developments that made early civilizations such as Rome and Greece possible, along with the building of cathedrals in the Middle Ages which were critical to the development of the modern world. 

This technology continues to this day. The woven clothes we wear and the cloth we use probably developed from this technology along with the making of paper and with the many baskets and other containers that every family has and are essential.

A Personal Story: How I Put My Minor Together
When I was getting my Master's degree in Communication (it would now be called Media) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a minor was required. I was interested in Anthropology, so I got permission to make that my minor if I could find a teacher in the Anthropology department who would work with me. I knew several students in that department, and they all recommended one professor who I liked a lot. Together, we designed and created three courses. The first course was to watch all the anthropology-related documentaries that the University had, which were a lot, and then write a paper about them. Next, I did a study of a very small town in North Carolina that had gone from nothing to a boom town, and then to a busted town. I had aerial photographs that I put together and then overlaid them on transparent sheets to show the changes in the town. The last course was an elaborate three-screen sound-slide show that showed the impact of building a dam and the people who had to be relocated. This project was really too big for one course, but we made it work. 

Right now, many universities allow a student to self-design a minor when getting a B.A. or other degree. So today a student could minor in Woven-Fiber Technology. This option is often available at many universities. They could select from the courses I outlined, for example, or create their own set of courses. Check with your advisor, search your school's online information, and look in the school's catalogue.

"Relatively few tribes of American Indians understood pottery, except in the crudest form. As for basketry, it may be said that every Indian from the land of the Esquimaux [ED: land of the Inuit or people formerly known as Eskimos] down through Mexico was a basket weaver."
American Indians: first families of the Southwest by Huckel.

The following are course ideas that you can modify, combine, or edit anyway you want. This article is covered by the Creative Commons copyright meaning that you can quote my writing directly and/or edit without permission from me. However, you do need to credit me, Rick Doble, and my blog, DeconstructingTime. This course list might help you start thinking about how you would like to put your self-designed minor together but these are only suggestions. Have fun and make your own program.

----------------------- COURSE IDEAS ----------------------- 
-- RANDOM BASKETS:
A course could begin with random basket weaving based on ideas derived from pictures of bird nests and other natural items like spider webs -- you would be asked to study such natural objects and then make a random basket or two from what you learned without a teacher's direction.

-- BASKETS WORLDWIDE:
With the help of the Internet, you can look at hundreds if not thousands of baskets from different areas of the world and from different times in history. There are many basket museums also. Study these baskets for the weave, the materials, the overall design, and their intended use. Write a paper with your observations.

-- COMBINING MATERIALS: 
This course covers making objects in which weaving is only part of the item, such as a table that combines wood and weaving. For example, wood can provide the frame or the skeleton for an object like a chair, or a hamper; then woven fabric is woven around this skeleton.

-- TEXTILES: 
This course includes a study of fabric, looms, and the cloths we wear, along with sails for sailing ships and sacks for carrying grain. The weaving of wide, large cloth was probably perfected in the Neolithic era with the invention of the Neolithic loom, along with a very sophisticated use of flax that was grown for the purpose of making linen. The method for processing flax into linen was quite complex and was still used until recently. Flax is perhaps the oldest cultivated plant whose fiber was used to make cloth. The history of textiles would fill many books, so a student will need to condense this history or focus on one aspect of textile making or textile use, or textile materials, such as sails on boats.

-- CORDAGE: 
Cordage has been used extensively for a wide variety of applications all through history. The oldest cordage found is about 50,000 years old and was made by Neanderthals. Part of the emphasis in this course would include working with perhaps a hundred knots. The ability to make knots greatly increased the practical ways that rope could be used. In both the Roman times and the Middle Ages, rope was essential for maritime use and even in the Roman Colosseum, where ropes were used to raise and lower doors for the events. In the Middle Ages rope was used by bell ringers, horse handlers and grooms, and also builders when they positioned tons of stone to build cathedrals.

-- CULTURE AND RELIGION: 
This course is about how basketry and other woven items are often an integral part of a culture and its customs, and how religion, myth, and spiritual beliefs are part of this story. Baskets often have a spiritual meaning. Just about every tribe had/has a story about how the Earth was created or how their tribe came to be what it has become, which often includes basketry. Many basket patterns had a religious connection. At least four African peoples today make baskets with flat bottoms that have a religious significance, for example. Native American Indians, such as those in the very large Algonquian nation, had tribes that wove or designed baskets that were specific to a tribe. 

-- HISTORY: 
History can be many things: It can be oral history as told by individuals, the history of a clan or tribe, the history of a design or style, or the history of a technology. For example, the known technological history of basket weaving began about 10,500 years ago in the Neolithic era, since the oldest known complete basket was found dating to that time. A history might include the use of special early baskets that were used for a sophisticated storage method that kept grain from becoming moldy, or infested with insects or rodents.

-- THE MODERN USE OF WEAVING: 
This topic covers new clothing, designs, and structural items, especially in the arts. Modern art and artists would be important to this class. State-of-the-art wearable clothing is also an emerging category. For example, the display of dresses at the prestigious Metropolitan Museum Met Gala in New York, which is held every spring, shows cutting edge fabric design and cutting-edge fabrics. It is considered the most important world event in fashion.

-- MATERIALS: 
In the past, baskets were made with local materials that could vary greatly since people had to work with what they could find locally and know when the best time was to harvest and process them. The wide variety of materials that could be used is often quite remarkable. Many woven-fiber weavers used a combination of local materials to construct a basket or other item. Distinctive basket designs often occurred due to the limitations and strengths of local plants.

-- LEARNING: 
This course is about how basket making can be taught to young people so that the art of the craft and traditions continue. In one part, for example, students could learn to weave baskets with a non-verbal "show and tell" way of learning, as this method may have also been used for thousands of years before language was fully developed. It can also be taught by a teacher who explains each step.

-- PALEOLITHIC SPECULATION: 
You will do a full review of all woven-fiber related science, evidence, and theories about basketry and woven-fiber development in the Paleolithic era. This might include ideas for computer simulations and studies of brain activity when making various baskets. Brain activity has been studied, for example, when a person makes the simplest stone age tool and then a much more complex tool; this was done to study the cognitive demands of each process. Perhaps the same could be done for basketry. Computer simulations are also possible, such as a simulation that studied the effect of carry baskets vs. no carry bassets in terms of a tribe's survival.

-- CASE STUDY:
This course would go into depth about one place, time, or technology; in this project, a student would aim for a complete picture. For example, in a project involving rope, he or she would link together the technical side of making rope, the practical use of rope, and the cultural, religious, and mythical aspects of rope making (cordage), such as building cathedrals. Suggested examples follow.
   * A study of Aboriginal weaving today: In Australia today hundreds of types of baskets and designs are still being made and are based on traditions going back thousands of years. This would allow comparing different techniques and designs from the same basic cultures and environment.
   * Asian basket weaving: This has a long tradition, and there are museums with many types of baskets. Special baskets for Buddhist offerings or for weddings or the Japanese tea ceremony were often made of bamboo, along with a wide range of baskets for agriculture, for carrying and storing food. 
   * Native American Indian basket weaving: Some tribes were known as Basket people, as they had so many baskets. These Indians made baskets for just about anything such as plates, cups, huge back carrying burden baskets, water proof baskets for carrying water, and cooking baskets.
   * Rope was indispensable in Classical Rome: It was essential for building, shipping, the military, and games at the Roman Colosseum.
   * Rope and fabric in the Age of Sail (roughly 16th to mid-19th century): These technologies allowed the exploration of the world; the phrase "learn the ropes" comes from this era, as ropes were both essential and complicated at this time.
   * The development of power looms in the 19th century revolutionized fabric making: In just a few years, the number of power looms exploded so that thousands of such looms were operating.
   * In the Neolithic era, weaving was developed to a high degree: Reed technology was used to build large houses and boats made of reeds, for example; reed baskets were probably widely used in agriculture, and reed baskets were used to dredge canals. Reed technology was used to build levees and to control irrigation. The large looms that made wide cloth were probably invented in the Neolithic era. Also, the deliberate cultivation of flax and the difficult processing of it into linen occurred in the Neolithic.
   * The production and monopoly of silk in China: The Chinese were able to keep their knowledge of silk production and weaving secret for thousands of years.
   * Rope in the Middle Ages was an essential: It was used for boats and maritime needs, building cathedrals, and in agriculture, and its use continued to expand greatly.
   * The Mesopotamian first cities were built on reed technology: This included canals, irrigation, flood control, fleets of small boats, imports and exports on their very large reed seafaring ships, along with the widespread use of reed technology in the supporting farms that provided the grain for the cities. Many of the farming towns and villages were built almost entirely with reeds.
   * Esparto culture in Spain: Use of the esparto plant for weaving goes back at least 7,000 years, when baskets and shoes of that age were found in a cave, Cueva de los Murciélagos, Albuñol, Granada. Declared a 'national fiber,' it is known for making the best quality ropes and a host of other items such as shoes, furniture, open weave snail baskets for collecting snails, and waterproof esparto canteens that were used to carry water. The list of esparto items is much longer, but a student will find this out when they pick this topic.

------------- PICTURE GALLERY -------------

ROPE: 40 ka
Direct evidence has been found of rope strands from the late Middle Paleolithic. Microscopic photos confirm that sophisticated rope-making was taking place before the Upper Paleolithic. (Hardy et al., "Direct evidence of Neanderthal fibre technology...")

<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61839-w>


LEFT: Reconstruction of a Neolithic loom around the time that Otzi, the Neolithic frozen 'ice man' natural mummy, was alive (ca. 3300 BCE), 
RIGHT: Clothing woven by this loom, in archeoParc in Schnals, South Tyrol, Italy.
(archeoParc Val Senales - Ötzi Museum) 


A few examples of knots from an old Larousse book no longer under copyright. This shows the virtually infinite number of combinations of rope and knotting that are possible


A finished weaverbird's nest.
Detail of the above finished bird nest.


File:Kendall Jenner Met Gala.jpg
Kendall Jenner at the Met Gala.





Examples Of Different Fish Traps (Tools) From Around The World Made With Basket Weaving Technology.
(TOP LEFT) A traditional basket for gathering snails in Southern Spain.
(TOP RIGHT) Fish Trap, Aitutaki (Cook Islands).
(BOTTOM LEFT) Braided fish trap, Indonesia.
(BOTTOM RIGHT) "Bamboo fish pot or trap in general use in Porto Rico."
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snail_basket.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FMIB_33815_Fish_Trap,_Aitutaki.jpeg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COLLECTIE_TROPENMUSEUM_Gevlochten_visfuik_TMnr_15-454.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FMIB_33300_Bamboo_Fish_Pot_or_Trap_in_General_Use_in_Porto_Rico.jpeg


Traditional reed/fiber boats from around the world.
TOP LEFT: "Tankwa or tangwa: Traditional Ethiopian embarcation from Lac Tana, made of papyrus by Nagades people."
TOP RIGHT: "Reed boat at Ekehagen Prehistoric village outside Åsarp, Falköping Municipality, Västergötland, Västra Götaland County, Sweden." 
BOTTOM LEFT: "Reed boat; exhibition in the Doria Castle of Castelsardo, Sardinia, Italy"


Reed and woven-fiber technology at its height.
[TOP] This large reed boat is an artist's conception of a boat docking at a Mesopotamian city around 5000 years ago. While a fanciful painting, it is probably not an inaccurate representation of the highly developed reed technology at that time.
While still in the public domain, the link to this picture is no longer available.
[BOTTOM] Like reed cathedrals, large vaulted mudhifs, as they are called, were made entirely from reeds, including the rope. The largest and best-made ones were used for ceremonial purposes and community gatherings. The interiors often displayed dazzling patterns of light as the light came through the intricate weaving work. 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mudhif_Reception_Hall_(30943793762).jpg

An entire indigenous pre-Incan community in South America today
(the Uru or Uros people)
made with woven-fiber technology: the boats, the houses, the clothes, and even the floating island,



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 2, 2025

Civilization Begins In The Neolithic?

Does The Rise Of The First City
In The World
Indicate That The Neolithic Era
Was The Beginning Of Civilization?

Was there a direct evolution of some Neolithic societies in Mesopotamia that led to the first city, Uruk, The Mother of All Cities? This is important because Uruk became the model for many cities after that.

With apologies to my academic readers.
I have taken liberties in this article with the location of the citations because I used so many quotations. They are located below each quote or major idea along with an Internet link to the full document. These links will allow the reader to view the authority of the source and to read the document cited.Every text before a citation is a quote unless it is unclear. In that cae I have added quote marks as needed.

INTRODUCTION

It is my contention that civilization began in the Middle to Late Neolithic. 

The Ubaid Neolithic cultures and societies provided the essential ingredients for the first city-states to emerge. Most importantly, it was not just one element that they provided. Agriculture was, of course, essential but it was a very sophisticated intensive agriculture that produced a surplus and allowed the cities to emerge. 

"Agriculture is believed to be a pre-requisite for cities..."
--------------
Urbanization and the Development of Cities

Yet, in addition to agriculture there were a number of critical innovations, such as the first large villages. Thousands of people lived close together which had never been done before. This laid the groundwork for the later large cities. 

Civilization is based on an improbable idea -- that strangers can live and work together in an urban setting forging new allegiancies to replace the natural ties of family, clan, or tribe.
It's a very unnatural way of living.
--------------
Miles, Richard PhD. BBC: Ancient Worlds/S1:E1 (Come Together).

Moreover, it was unique religious Neolithic architecture that provided the basic symbolic model that later was adopted and enhanced by the cities. These early monuments evolved into huge magnificent Ziggurats built by almost every city-state in Mesopotamia. They became symbols for each city and a key part of each citizen's identity. 

There was also an extensive 'reed' technology that was developed with Neolithic technology and that was used to make boats of different sizes and was essential for commerce. This reed technology was also used to make a wide variety of essential items, all of which continued to be made in the cities.

And finally, and just as important, there was a new sense of time, of linear time, that was essential for agriculture but also for city planning.

All of these things came from the Neolithic Ubaid cultures in Mesopotamia and the city-states could not have emerged or become established and powerful without them. 

Moreover, the Neolithic Ubaid culture was prevalent throughout Mesopotamia for more than a thousand years before the rise of the cities. 


EXPERTS AGREE THAT THE UBAID NEOLITHIC CULTURE
PROVIDED A SOLID FOUNDATION FOR THE RISE OF THE CITIES

An understanding of the rise of complex cultures [in Mesopotamia] should begin with the Ubaid Period which falls chronologically between the origins of agriculture and the rise of urbanism. During the Ubaid a new social order was evolving in southern Mesopotamia and the Susiana Plain (ELAM) of southwest Iran out of which emerged complex societies with a centralized state structure.
------------------------
Beyond the Ubaid: Transformation and Integration in the Late Prehistoric Societies of the Middle East
Edited by Robert A. Carter and Graham Philip (PDF)

"During the fourth millennium B.C, the Mesopotamian mix began to tame alluvial plain and marshlands between the two rivers, the land we call Sumer, with roads and canals. Here Sumerian's farm villages evolved into small city-states, each clustered around a temple and ruled by an ensi or "priest-ruler". 
------------------------
Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology, Brown University.

There was much continuity between the Ubaid culture and the succeeding Uruk period [the first city], when many of the earlier traditions were elaborated, particularly in architecture.
---------------
Department of Ancient Near Eastern Art. “The Ubaid Period (5500–4000 B.C.).” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art (October 2003). http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/ubai/hd_ubai.htm

In addition, it is important to note that inventing new interconnected technologies from scratch was probably more difficult than further developing those technologies. For example, the Ubaid societies developed the concept of canals and then engineered them into a network of 'water highways' that were used for irrigation, flood control, commerce, and transportation. This idea, this engineering, and a complex network of canals was extensively developed later by the great city-states in Mesopotamia, but they were building on the original ideas that had been put in place by the Neolithic Ubaid engineers.

However, the Ubaid technology went much further. It combined agriculture with the flexibility of the canals to deliver grain to a central control. And it created  fleets of reed boats to work the canals. In other words they did not develop one technology they invented several that worked together.

In the past, the person or culture that came up with a new idea was given the credit for that idea. Mesopotamian cities, for example, have been credited with creating written language and records. So in this case, the Ubaid Neolithic cultures should be given the credit for creating an early civilization. 

In spite of this argument, I have to admit there is a problem when evaluating the Neolithic. Much of it is lost or buried under many layers of soil. There is simply much less evidence than there is for the later cities.

Nevertheless, based on what we do know and based on what I outline in this article, it appears possible that early civilization was created in the Middle to Late Neolithic. 

For these reasons, I propose that the later part of the Neolithic period should be considered the beginning of civilization.

Middle to Late Neolithic   = Civilization 1.0
Mesopotamia and Egypt  = Civilization 2.0

Yet my idea that civilization began perhaps thousands of years earlier than historians had previously thought, and in the Neolithic era, is only a general hypothesis. It will take many years of study, research, and excavations to prove or disprove this idea.


THE FIRST CITY AND ITS RELATION TO THE NEOLITHIC

However, there is one specific time period that strongly suggests the truth of this idea. And that idea is the rise of the Mother of All Cities, the city of Uruk, the first city in the world, which became the model for most other cities in Mesopotamia. In this case, the path from Neolithic to city-state was much clearer and the connection more obvious.
 
Uruk was known as the "Mother of All Cities" because it was the first city, and at one point, the largest city in the world.

The Ubaid culture led to the emergence of Uruk in multiple ways, such as the development of agriculture, architecture, urban organization, belief systems, and various technologies such as weaving, pottery, and reed technologies, along with a new sense of time. 

Mesopotamian scholars are in agreement that the city of Uruk could not have emerged without a solid foundation that had been built by the Ubaid culture.

The first cities all have their roots in earlier "temple towns" that first arose in the Ubaid period ca. 5500-4000 BC. Understanding the Ubaid culture is thus crucial for any investigation of how complex societies first developed. 
--------------
Incipient Social Complexity in The Ubaid Horizon (5800-4000 BC). U.S. National Science Foundation. Program Manager: John Yellen. BCS  Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Science; SBE  Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Science.

However, the rise of the other city-states in Mesopotamia may have developed differently. While the Neolithic Ubaid culture was widespread throughout Mesopotamia, it does not mean that early civilization began the same way for all cities. However, in the case of Uruk, it appears to have come directly from the surrounding Ubaid culture. So this lends support to the idea that civilization in general began in the Middle to Late Neolithic era.

However, many scholars make a clear distinction. They believe that certain aspects of the cities such as the huge magnificent Ziggurat towers, the dense population, the walled cities, and the right angled white buildings made of fired bricks were markedly different from the Neolithic. In addition many consider the invention of writing by the cities to be a key difference. Therefore they believe civilization began when the city-states became established.

Yet, these often-cited aspects ignore other important parts of city life. Outside the city walls, a much larger farm population lived an essentially New Stone Age (Neolithic) existence that supplied the surplus grain these cities required. These outside areas contained villages and towns where farmers tended the fields and supplied the surplus grain that made these cities possible. 

Moreover, critical Neolithic farm tools, such as the sickle and plow, continued to be used for thousands of years all through the Bronze Age. These better Neolithic tools were essential for the planting and harvesting of barley, the main crop, and other crops as well. Bronze was too soft for this kind of work and too expensive. 


"Recreation of a Neolithic sickle, Museum Quintana, Künzing, Germany."
Flint was held in place with bitumen (similar to asphalt) that occurred naturally.  

"Stone tools maintained themselves during the Metal Age, yielding only slowly to the new material, which was expensive and the product of special skills. The copper and bronze tools and weapons... that constitute impressive displays in museums were rare luxuries. "
--------------- 
Britannica. "Neolithic Tools." Britannica.com. https://www.britannica.com/technology/hand-tool/Neolithic-tools

From the Metropolitan Museum in NYC:
"Flint...Was the primary material used to make sickles in Egypt until the first millennium B.C. When iron became more widely available. The reason for using flint was probably multifaceted and included considerations such as its abundance, its ease of manufacture compared to casting metal tools, flint’s proficiency at cutting grain.."
---------------
Bifacial Sickle Insert, Neolithic–Predynastic Period, ca. 5000–3100 B.C. Metropolitan Museum.


Large community buildings made entirely of reeds, known as mudhifs.


Rabas or homes for the average person.


Long before the rise of civilization in Sumer, reed houses were probably being built in the Neolithic era.
"Reed buildings were constructed from as early as the preceding Ubaid Period."
---------------
Perkins, A.L. 1949. The comparative archaeology of early Mesopotamia. SAOC 25. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 88.

There was another key technology that has gone largely ignored. It was vital to the villages outside the walls of the cities but also vital to the cities themselves. I am talking about reed technology.

Later, with the rise of the great city-states in Mesopotamia, reed houses were often built in the outlying farm villages and outside the walls of the city.

"Reed houses undoubtedly formed a more important part of the urban and rural landscape than has generally been recognized by scholars, who have tended to assume that all of the population in Mesopotamia lived in mudbrick dwellings."
------------------
Potts, D.T. Mesopotamian Civilization, The Material Foundations, p. 117. London: The Athlone Press. 1997.


"2 people in a mashoof (Arab canoe) surrounded by reeds."

Mesopotamia contained an abundance of high-quality reeds that grew wild. Farming villages and towns utilized Neolithic reed technology to make comfortable, inexpensive reed homes and sophisticated, large community buildings. Furthermore, reeds were used to make boats that worked the canals, enabled commerce, and brought the harvest to the cities. This versatile and advanced reed technology was also used to make rope, fences, baskets, containers, furniture, fish traps, and all-purpose mats.

In Mesopotamia, and particularly in the region where the Tigris and Euphrates meet the Persian Gulf, that natural resource was, and still is, the reed that grows in marsh-like environments. Generally, these reeds are quite sturdy and can grow to lengths of up to 15 feet. Now if you’re wanting to build a boat, 15 feet of reed gives you a fair amount of material to work with, it would allow you to construct a decent sized vessel without even having to combine reeds for purposes of achieving greater length.
--------------
Boating with the Ubaid People. Maritime History. Episode 001.


A model of a large reed ship, the Tigris.
While this model may not apply to the Ubaid time period, it demonstrates that boats of this size could be built. Furthermore, it has been proven that seafaring boats were constructed in the Ubaid era.
This example of a large boat could carry 50 tons of cargo. Thor Heyerdahl built the full-scale ship to prove the seaworthiness of reed ships. He sailed the Tigris with no problems for 5 months in the Persian Gulf.
"Model of the reed boat Tigris, boat of Thor Heyerdahl." 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tigris_Model_Pyramids_of_Guimar.jpg

It has been well established that sophisticated large seagoing reed ships had been developed in the Neolithic era before the beginning of Mesopotamian cities and the world's first civilization arose. 
------------------
Carter, R. A. "Boat remains and maritime trade in the Persian Gulf during sixth and fifth millennia BC." Antiquity, 80 (307), 2006, pp. 52

While reeds were an important material for farming villages that supported the cities, reeds were also a critical resource for the cities. While not well understood today, port receipts, indicating the delivery of reed bundles, clearly show that reeds were perhaps the second largest industry after agriculture. Neolithic technology had taken weaving with reeds (woven-fiber technology) to a high level of sophistication, which continued in the cities for thousands of years all during the time period of the great civilizations. In particular reed boats of all sizes were essential for transportation, city commerce and to bring the harvest to the city.
---------------
Mesopotamian Misconceptions. DeconstructingTime (2021). 
https://deconstructingtime.blogspot.com/2021/06/mesopotamian-misconceptions.html

"Cucuteni (a Neolithic Culture) kiln reconstruction "
Art Museum, Piatra Neamt, Romania. The invention of the kiln was as important as the invention of pottery. It allowed high sustained temperatures, which later would be modified for the smelting of metals.


Ubaid pottery.
Neolithic societies invented the kiln and pottery technology which required high and consistent temperatures. Recent discoveries found that they also invented the pottery wheel. 


A BASIC MISUNDERSTANDING

When I took the required Western History course in college, there was a sharp distinction between the Neolithic (New Stone Age) and the start of civilization which was often coupled with the arrival of the Bronze Age. This period, which has also been called the Late Stone Age, was, we were told, a crude, rough, Stone Age era. Even though it had made major advances, it was still a long way away from the sophistication and precision of civilization. 

Yet, I believe this is incorrect. And I am not the first person to say this.

Today archaeologists are beginning to reexamine and reevaluate these long held assumptions. "Not too long ago, archaeologist Rengert Elburg found something that convinced him that 'stone age sophistication' is not a contradiction in terms."
---------------
Curry, Andrew. The Neolithic Toolkit. Archaeology.Org, November/December 2014. https://archaeology.org/issues/november-december-2014/features/germany-recreating-neolithic-toolkit/

Yet, I will go much further. I will argue that the New Stone Age was quite advanced and that, in the case of some cities in Mesopotamia, it slowly evolved, almost seamlessly, into the era of civilized city-states. 

But perhaps more importantly, the legacy of New Stone Age agriculture, technology, belief systems, and especially timekeeping continued all during the early and late civilizations and were a critical part. 

The Neolithic cultures set the tone and put forward ideas that changed the world and that we still live with today. Without these ideas and skills, these early civilizations could not have emerged or existed. And to take it one step further, our modern world would not exist.

Here is what the Metropolitan Museum said about these cultures and the transition to a city and urban way of life.

Much of Mesopotamia shared a common culture, called Ubaid [a Neolithic culture] after the site where evidence for it was first found. Characterized by a distinctive type of pottery, this culture originated on the flat alluvial plains of southern Mesopotamia (ancient Iraq) around 6200 B.C. 
Indeed, it was during this period that the first identifiable villages developed in the region. Some villages began to develop into towns and became focused on monumental buildings, such as at Eridu and Uruk.
There was much continuity between the Ubaid culture and the succeeding Uruk period [the first city], when many of the earlier traditions were elaborated, particularly in architecture.
----------------------
Department of Ancient Near Eastern Art. “The Ubaid Period (5500–4000 B.C.).” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art (October 2003). http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/ubai/hd_ubai.htm 

In addition, the excavation of a large Neolithic Ubaid town (occupied approx. 6000 - 5000 BCE) shows that the Ubaid culture could establish a complex village long before Uruk and other Mesopotamian city-states came into being.

The recently excavated Ubaid village of "Tell Abada is of particular importance; it is an almost complete village with three occupational levels unearthed. Several residential houses and buildings with distinctive architectural features are exposed. Industrial workshops dedicated to the manufacture of pottery vessels are present. Of express interest was the first-time discovery of pottery-making equipment, notably the potter’s wheel."
----------------------
Jasim, Sabah Abboud. An Ubaid Village in Central Mesopotamia. Oriental Institute Publications 147,
Chicago: The Oriental Institute, 2021.

Model of a large Neolithic village.  
This is the Neolithic town Çatalhöyük (CATALHOYUK) in the Anatolia region of Turkey. It was perhaps the first city in the world, founded about 9500 years ago (BP). At its height, 8,000-10,000 people may have lived there.
---------------------- 
From Video Of Catalhoyuk Model Recreation.
WWW.ZDF.DE: Catalhöyük: humanity's first large-scale settlement (CC BY 4.0). Video with Creative Commons license for free use. 
The producer, ZDF, (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen) is a German public-service television broadcaster based in Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate. 


All this supports the idea that instead of there being a clear distinction between the rustic New Stone Age and the rise of highly populated city-state civilizations, the two were intertwined and inseparable. 

Even the later huge religious Ziggurats in the cities had often begun as Neolithic designs which were enlarged and became symbols for each city. 

The Ubaid period saw the development of the first complex societies in southern Mesopotamia, with the earliest evidence for towns with temples, economic differentiation, irrigation, and centralized leadership.
The first cities all have their roots in earlier "temple towns" that first arose in the Ubaid period ca. 5500-4000 BC. Understanding the Ubaid culture is thus crucial for any investigation of how complex societies first developed. 
---------------------
Incipient Social Complexity in The Ubaid Horizon (5800-4000 BC). U.S. National Science Foundation. Program Manager: John Yellen. BCS  Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Science; SBE  Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Science.

And there was more. The critical new understanding of linear time that had developed in the Neolithic era was passed on to city administrators who refined it, further divided it, and used it to coordinate activities such as the storage and distribution of grain.

ABOUT NEOLITHIC TOWNS AND CIVILIZED CITIES

One of the main benchmarks that has kept the late Neolithic cultures from being considered early civilizations has been the small number of people in a village or town. The population of the Mesopotamian cities was in the tens of thousands, while the largest Neolithic village was only about 4000. 

Yet again, this shows a lack of understanding about the Neolithic way of life. It ignores a major early advance made by Neolithic cultures that was fundamental to the rise of the cities.

While not well appreciated today, another skill of Neolithic cultures was to create villages and towns that had many more people than the small tribes which had been essential for their previous nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle. So in addition to sedentary living, Neolithic cultures found a way to accommodate many more people living together. 

This particular innovation of the Neolithic cultures was a major achievement but has not been well understood in our modern world.

To go from living in a small nomadic tribe where everyone knew everyone, to a sedentary village of hundreds or thousands of people was a huge change. 

"Hunter-gatherer groups tended to range in size from an extended family to a larger band of no more than about 100 people."
------------
National Geographic, Feb 9, 2024.

An assessment of existing estimates indicates that PPN  [Pre-Pottery Neolithic] villages may have been occupied by a maximum of around 500 people during the PPNA; up to 1400 people by the Middle PPNB; and up to 4000 people by the Late PPNB.
---------------
Birch-Chapman, Shannon et al. "Estimating population size, density and dynamics of Pre-Pottery Neolithic villages in the central and southern Levant." Taylor & Francis Group, Mar 28, 2017.

The clever Neolithic cultures found a way for thousands of people to live in relative harmony. The Neolithic communities created distinctive shrines and religious buildings that everyone paid homage to. This meant that people could assume that even a stranger in their town held the same fundamental beliefs. 

Neolithic cultures passed this skill and understanding of symbolism on to the city-states, which were then able to expand the Neolithic model with their huge temples and large populations.


BUT WHAT ABOUT WRITING?

For many historians, the invention of writing by the cities was a critical dividing point between the Neolithic and the start of civilization. However, writing took about a thousand years to develop after Uruk was founded and, therefore, was not essential in the beginning. Just like in the early cities that had small populations, writing was not needed or necessary, and so it was not critical during the Neolithic era. But reed boats, agriculture, canals, villages, and religious shrines were essential, and these had been well established by the Ubaid Neolithic cultures long before the cities emerged. 

 "Early writing tablet recording the allocation of beer; 3100-3000 BC."
Example of how writing was begun for accounting purposes.

For many historians, history starts with writing, and everything before that is prehistory. However, I argue that writing was only one of a number of  important technologies.  Many more essential technologies were developed in the late Neolithic -- and therefore, writing by itself, should not be the defining technology that divides the Neolithic from Civilization.


A HISTORICAL MISUNDERSTANDING

The Neolithic way of life was a decisive break from the Paleolithic Old Stone Age past. It was completely different from the nomadic small tribe hunter-gatherer foraging way of life that had existed for millions of years. Although it was labeled 'stone age,' the New Stone age had much more in common with the rise of civilizations and much less in common with the Old Stone Age. 

Furthermore, the great civilizations in Mesopotamia did not reject or distance themselves from the preceding Ubaid Neolithic way of life, instead, they embraced it. They built around previous sacred Ubaid religious areas and deliberately designed new religious structures to express continuity with the Ubaid past.

The transition period happened over a thousand years, from about 5500 BCE to 4000 BCE. Due to the particular circumstances of Southern Mesopotamia, the development seemed almost natural or inevitable. The rise of the great city of Uruk sprang from the ongoing success of the surrounding Ubaid Neolithic farming that had developed a complex, intensive, and unique system that produced a surplus of grain, mostly barley. It was the surplus that was the critical tipping point because surpluses allowed people who did not farm to specialize or to administrate and govern. 

This surplus then 'funded' (so to speak) the establishment of administrative centers, huge granaries, and large temples. Once in place, the granaries allowed administrators to plan the distribution of grain to 'pay' its workers and to also plan for times of poor harvests.

In Mesopotamia, grain was king. Or, to put it more accurately, grain made kings. The palace and temple institutions that rose to prominence during the third millennium BC were built on the production, stockpiling, and distribution of grain...
---------------
Paulette,Tate. Dissertations: Grain Storage and the Moral Economy in Mesopotamia (3000-2000 BC). Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures. Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, University of Chicago (2015).

It is important to note that this was a peaceful transition that grew out of a developing technology. This success of Neolithic farming technology led to the creation of the city-state of Uruk. It did not come about because of war, or invasions, or subjugation.

 "A contextual analysis comparing different regions shows that the Ubaid expansion took place largely through the peaceful spread of an ideology, leading to the formation of numerous new indigenous identities that appropriated and transformed superficial elements of Ubaid material culture into locally distinct expressions."
---------------
Hamblin, William J. (2006-09-27). Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203965566. ISBN 978-1-134-52063-3.


AGRICULTURE AS AN EXAMPLE
OF SOPHISTICATED
ESSENTIAL NEOLITHIC TECHNOLOGY


GRAIN STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION

To everyone's surprise, the sophisticated storage of grain turned out to be one of the earliest technologies associated with agriculture.

Surprisingly, complex storage was in place during the early Neolithic, even before "the emergence of domestication and large-scale sedentary communities by at least 1,000 years." (See Kuijt et al next.)

"Life-history of Structure 4 granary Dhra', Jordan.
This illustration shows the cyclical process of construction, use, and abandonment over several hundred years (Illustration by E. Carlson)."

This blog is about the human perception of time. Sophisticated long-term storage implies a new Neolithic sense of time, unlike the earlier nomadic hunter-gatherers homo sapiens who ate food immediately as they found it and did not save it.

While not often mentioned by researchers, storage of grains was as important as agriculture. This meant that the Neolithic people not only had to decide which plants to cultivate but also which could be stored long-term. Growing bountiful crops was pointless if the harvest spoiled. In Mesopotamia the main such cereal crop was barley.

"These morphological changes are the byproduct of shifts in human practices...combining the active management and extraction of plant resources such as cultivation, with new systems for food processing and storage. The increasingly “built world” of the Neolithic sees important transitions" during the PPNA (prepottery) Neolithic.

"Food storage is a vital component in the economic and social package that comprises the Neolithic, contributing to plant domestication, increasingly sedentary lifestyles, and new social organizations... The granaries represent a critical evolutionary shift in the relationship between people and plant foods, which precedes the emergence of domestication and large-scale sedentary communities by at least 1,000 years."
----------------------
Kuijt I., Finlayson B. Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 7;106(27):10966-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812764106. Epub 2009 Jun 22. PMID: 19549877; PMCID: PMC2700141.  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26314333_Evidence_for_food_storage_and_predomestication_granaries_11000_years_ago_in_the_Jordan_Valley


 I would add that storing grain long term probably led to an administrative system that was hierarchical as grain not only had to be saved but then distributed in an equitable manner. This may also have been one of the Neolithic practices which were later expanded in the city-states with the power of the king and his administration.


FARMING

While the Neolithic era is rightly credited with the invention of agriculture, this hardly conveys the sophistication of their technology. After focusing on a limited number of basic plants (founder plants), they domesticated various strains for much greater yields. They also domesticated strains that were easier to harvest. 


"The majority of the crops and vegetables of today were domesticated
from their wild progenitors within the past 12,000 years."
(Alseekh, Saleh et al. Domestication of Crop Metabolomes)

CANALS

In Mesopotamia, they built a complex network of canals that brought water from the rivers into the fields for irrigation and flood control and that were also used for transportation, commerce and delivering the harvest using a wide variety of boats made of reeds. Some scholars consider these water highways to be as important as irrigation. They also built flood control systems.  

"Southern Mesopotamia was a land dominated not only by the Euphrates and its branches but by a substantial number of artificial canals as well, many of which were navigable. Not surprisingly, therefore, a great deal of travel, transport, and communication was waterborne, and indeed some scholars consider the facilitation of trade and transport by Mesopotamia's canals (whether so intended or not) to have been as important a role as irrigation."
------------|
Potts, D.T. Mesopotamian Civilization, The Material Foundations, p. 122. London: The Athlone Press. 1997.

 Even today, 90% of our calories come from foods that were domesticated in this first wave of the agricultural revolution.
--------------
van der Crabben, Jan. The World History Encyclopedia,  22 March 2023.
https://www.worldhistory.org/article/9/agriculture-in-the-fertile-crescent--mesopotamia/


A SUMMARY OF ESSENTIAL NEOLITHIC TECHNOLOGIES

Here is a summary of 12 critical Neolithic technologies that were passed on to the Mesopotamian city-states, who continued to use and develop them.
Planting and farming; domestication of plants; irrigation; long term grain storage; canals; pottery; weaving and the development of the loom (considered the world's first machine); woven-fiber technology (reed technology) to make boats, houses, rope, and baskets; domestication of animals; the development of large complex sedentary villages; the development of sophisticated stone tools used all through the bronze age; and temple architecture. 

This article is almost 8,000 words long, so I will save a detailed discussion of weaving and other technologies for a future article.


HOW DID URUK COME INTO BEING?

The beginnings of...civilization, as we now call it, were sown when the heads of several different [Ubaid] family groups resolved that their chances of a prosperous and secure future would be enhanced if they worked together as a more or less permanent collective. It was this decision that resulted in the creation of Uruk, The Mother Of All Cities.
---------------------
Miles, Richard PhD. Ancient Worlds: The Search For The Origins Of Western Civilization. Allen Lane;,2010, page  3.

THE IMPORTANCE OF UBAID MYTHOLOGY & URUK TEMPLES

The city [Uruk] was formed when two smaller Ubaid settlements merged. The temple complexes at their cores became the Eanna District and the Anu District dedicated to [the goddess] Inanna and Anu, respectively.
--------------------
Harmansah, Ömür, The Archaeology of Mesopotamia: Ceremonial centers, urbanization and state formation in Southern Mesopotamia, 2007, p.699.

Both Neolithic Ubaid settlements retained their identity with their different temple districts in Uruk. Both districts honored, preserved, and revered their Ubaid past and legacy.

While Inanna was originally a goddess from the Late Ubaid period, she continued to be a major mythological figure in the Mesopotamian cities for thousands of years.

"Ishtar on an Akkadian seal."
Ishtar is the Akkadian name for the Sumerian goddess Inanna.


About Uruk and the Sumerian goddess Inanna (3400.2200 BC).

"The rulers of the Dynasties of Ur III and Isin Larsa appear to have had a strong predilection for the religious and literary traditions of Uruk, and their inscriptions and building activity at Uruk identify the site of a major temple complex connected with a cult of Inanna, called Eanna, 'the house of heaven'."
---------------------
Collins, Paul . The Sumerian goddess Inanna (3400-2200 BC). , Institute of Archaeology, UCL. Paper from the Institute of Archaeology 5(1994) 103-118]. download.pdf, page 106.


In the sacred Eanna district at Uruk, the Ubaid Neolithic heritage was revered for thousands of years. See the listing top left, bottom of the list. See location: Top Right indicated by the letter "U".
 
The early part of this evolution is best epitomized by the city of Uruk which grew from a small Ubaid town to a city of several thousand during a two-century period in the mid-4th millennium.  
The increasing size of the Uruk temple was equaled by its political importance. The temple combined religious worship, storerooms for agricultural surplus, administrative centers for the redistribution of food from the city (god) fields and subsidiary villages. 
-----------------------
Historic Overview of Early Mesopotamian Civilization. The University of New Mexico. http://www.unm.edu/~gbawden/328-sumhist/328-sumhist.htm



The Warka Vase
LEFT: Full photo of the vase
RIGHT: Detailed photo of each level.
"Warka vase, a slim alabaster vessel carved [with these images]...from bottom to top with: water, date palms, barley, and wheat, alternating rams and ewes, and men carrying baskets of foodstuffs to the goddess Inanna accepting the offerings."
The votive Vase of Warka, from Warka (ancient Uruk), Iraq. Jemdet Nasr period, 3000-2900 BCE. The Iraq Museum, Baghdad. 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Warka_vase_(background_retouched).jpg 

 

 A SOPHISTICATED CANAL SYSTEM
'HIGHWAYS' FOR UBAID VILLAGES AND THE CITY OF URUK


By the time the city of Uruk was founded with the agreement between the Ubaid families, Ubaid technology had created a network of complex canals and levees which had multiple purposes. These purposes included irrigation, flood control, travel, commerce. 
The Sumerians built complex canal systems to collect and channel the overflow of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. The canals were used to water and fertilize farm fields. The dams were built from reeds, palm trunks, and mud, and had gates that could be opened and closed to control the water flow. 
--------------
GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW

 

Carbon dating clearly shows that from the Middle to Late Ubaid period, sophisticated canal systems were being built. This is explained in a table that is contained in the following document.
--------------------
Egberts, Ella  et al. Dating ancient canal systems using radiocarbon dating and archaeological evidence at Tello/Girsu, Southern Mesopotamia, Iraq. Cambridge University Press: 08 August 2023. Creative Commons Copyright.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/dating-ancient-canal-systems-using-radiocarbon-dating-and-archaeological-evidence-at-tellogirsu-southern-mesopotamia-iraq/DFCB7F569B744396C9E4BDA923A8EB07

Uruk was extremely well penetrated by a canal system that has been described as, "Venice in the desert." This canal system flowed throughout the city connecting it with the maritime trade on the ancient Euphrates River as well as the surrounding agricultural belt. 
------------------------
Fassbinder, J.W.E., and H. Becker. Magnetometry at Uruk (Iraq): The city of King Gilgamesh, Archaeologia Polona, vol. 41, pp. 122–124, 2003.

Boats of all sizes were built. A fleet of such boats serviced the region. For the city-states, they were an absolute necessity because they brought in the food and supplies and were engaged in trade, all of which were essential for a city to operate.

ABOUT POPULATION SIZE
The farm population outside the city was much larger than that of the urban area. So a majority of the people and a majority of the land were outside the city. And it was these farmers that provided the grain for the city to function and survive. This means that a majority of the land and citizens did not live inside a walled city in brick houses, but instead lived outside, many in reed houses close to villages. These hamlets, villages, and towns probably lived in a way that was similar to the Late Neolithic. This was not uncomfortable or primitive but included sophisticated, large ceremonial buildings made entirely of reeds and comfortable reed houses

Artist's Concept Of Fiber Homes Outside An Early City


"An Arab Village of Reed Mats and Round Fort
on Lower Euphrates, Mesopotamia."


TODAY THE DEFINITION OF A CITY INCLUDES IMPORTANT ADJACENT COMMUNITIES
-- So The Surrounding Farmland At Uruk Should Be Considered Part Of The City

A central city and the surrounding area is today called a Metropolitan Area.
"The general concept of a metropolitan area (MA) is that of a core area containing a large population nucleus, together with adjacent communities that have a high degree of economic and social integration with that core."
----------------------
Definition from the US Census, Census.gov. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/GARM/Ch13GARM.pdf

At its peak the city of Uruk may have had 40,000 city dwellers, and another 80,000–90,000 people, mostly farmers, living outside it's walls.
-------------------
These population estimates from:
CITY:
Nissen, Hans J (2003). "Uruk and the formation of the city". In Aruz, J (ed.). Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 11–20. 
------------------
FARMERS AND THE POPULATION OF ADJACENT AREAS:
Algaze, Guillermo (2013). "The end of prehistory and the Uruk period". In Crawford, Harriet (ed.). The Sumerian World (PDF). London: Routledge. pp. 68–95. 

 

A NEW SENSE OF IDENTITY

The basic design and purpose of the huge Ziggurats that were built in most Mesopotamian city-states, was inherited from the Ubaid temples. 

The central ziggurat in Babylon.
In the distance can be seen two other ziggurats as well.
Entitled "Babylon and its three towers."


There was much continuity between the Ubaid culture and the succeeding Uruk period [the first city], when many of the earlier traditions were elaborated, particularly in architecture.
---------------
The Ubaid Period (5500–4000 B.C.)

"The temple at al 'Ubaid restored."
A Ubaid temple design which led to the design
of the huge Zigguats thousands of years later.


Originally a small, single-roomed shrine, the temple in the Ubaid period consisted of a rectangular building, measuring 80 by 40 feet, that stood on an artificial terrace. It had an “offering table” and an “altar” against the short walls, aisles down each side, and a facade decorated with niches. This temple, standing on a terrace probably originally designed to protect the building from flooding, is usually considered the prototype of the characteristic religious structure of later Babylonia, the Ziggurat.
-----------------
The emergence of Mesopotamian civilization. The Encyclopedia Britannica.

Computer Simulation Of The Ziggurat Of Ur
"Computer reconstruction of the Zugurat of Ur-Nammu...
built at the beginning of the 21st century BCE"


As we know from our own modern world, investing in public works is a tried and tested way to manufacture a common identity. They create civic totems to replace tribal ones.
--------------------------
Miles, Richard PhD. BBC: Ancient Worlds/ S1:E1 (Come Together).


THE IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN EARLY CIVILIZATIONS

It is my opinion that the main difference between the Middle to Late Ubaid Neolithic era and that of the early city-states was scale. 

Scale has its own particular demands. The scale of the cities required things that the earlier smaller villages had not required, such as an administrative structure, socialization, coordination, and massive buildings such as granaries. 

The need for complex organization and tracking led eventually to writing -- which was invented for accounting purposes. Nevertheless,as I wrote earlier, it still took about 1000 years after the founding of the city of Uruk for writing to be fully developed because in the early stages it was not essential. 

Writing was eventually needed because a city with tens of thousands of people required the sophisticated 'machinery' and coordination of a central government to gather, store and redistribute the grain and to do so in a timely manner which the entire city depended on.

'Beveled Rim Bowl' (BRB): The first mass-produced product.

Large scale also required mass production, such as pottery, that was inferior to the Ubaid pottery but which could be made in huge numbers. The standard-sized 'beveled rim bowls' (BRB) as they are called, were the first mass produced item in history and were also perhaps the first standard way to measure and distribute grain and food, like a kind of currency (which had not been invented yet). This is an example of a technology that came about due to the demands of a large society.

After about a thousand years, when the cities had become fully grown, the importance of scale was expressed in the huge, towering Ziggurats that stood at the heart of most cities and could be seen from any point in the city and its environs. Each Ziggurat had a design that was unique to a particular city. These iconic buildings were symbols and centers that created a shared identity among its people. And because they could be seen from any point including the outlying farms, they tied the citizens together.

Each Ziggurat was considered unique because they were built in different cities, dedicated to the specific patron deity of that city, resulting in variations in design and size, even though they shared the overall tiered pyramid-like structure characteristic of Ziggurats. 
----------------
GOOGLE AI OVERVIEW

Scale is also relative. 
The largest Mesopotamian city, Uruk, held perhaps 80,000 people at its height which was huge for the time and the largest city in the world at that moment, but which today would be considered small.

When the cities did become large they took on a different tone. Large buildings, writing, roads, wheeled carts, armies, mass produced woven cloth and pottery were now readily available.



THE NEOLITHIC LEGACY

The following three images are direct evidence from the time of Mesopotamian city-state civilizations. They show that thousands of years after the Ubaid era, Ubaid Neolithic ideas, designs, and engineering continued to be an important part of Mesopotamian life.

Continued use of reed boats thousands of years after the Ubaid era.
BOTTOM: Bas-relief: "The Assyrian military campaign in the marches of southern Iraq. This campaign was conducted against the Chaldeans in 700-699 BCE...Assyrian soldiers captured fled enemies on a reed boat." 
TOP: Drawing made from that same bas-relief. 
(King, Leonard. A History of Babylon. London, Chatto and Windus, 1915, p. 201.) 
This bas-relief shows that thousands of years after the end of the Ubaid Neolithic era, reed boats were being built and used.


Image of reed buildings thousands of years after the Ubaid era.
This image of a reed house on a Sumerian ceremonial trough from the 3rd Millennium shows that these houses were still an important part of the Mesopotamian landscape even as many buildings were being constructed of brick.
(The British Museum, WA 120000, neg. 252077)



"Babylonian cuneiform tablet with map of Nippur 1550-1450 BC. "

While this cuneiform tablet with a map of Nippur 1550-1450 BC is from a period thousands of years after the Neolitic Ubaid era, it includes the canals and water courses that were critical to the life of this city, canals that first began in Mesopotammia during the Ubaid era.

For the busy farmers of the Babylonian sacred city of Nippur, ready access to water was essential. It’s hardly surprising, then, that this tablet, which maps an area near the city, features a complex irrigation network of ditches and canals, depicted by lines, along with a number of towns and agricultural estates
----------------
Weiss, Daniel. Nippur Map Tablet. MAPPING THE PAST  MAY/JUNE 2019. Archaeology.Org.


SUMMARY

"The Mother of All Cities," Uruk, was the first city in the world and a model for many later cities. But this first city had grown and developed directly from the technology and customs of the surrounding farms, agriculture, towns, canals, temples and reed technology created by the Neolithic Ubaid people. 

What has been called Neolithic, at least a thousand yeas before the first city, created the intensive agricultural technology which produced surplus grain that allowed Uruk to rise up and become established. Ubaid technology also created the beginnings of a sophisticated 'water highway' system with canals and a fleet of  reed boats. 

But that is only looking at civilization in terms of technology. Just as importantly early Neolithic villages and towns provided the model for crowded cities, the model for thousands of people living closely together.

Neolithic towns, along with their way of life, sense of identity, belief system, symbols, monuments, ideas, and new sense of linear managed time created the foundation that was handed down to the first city, Uruk, a legacy that Mesopotamian cities were proud to build on.
 
Moreover, for thousands of years, the existence of these cities depended on the continuing surplus grain that farmers kept producing, farmers who lived a life similar to the Neolithic. Many of the critical farm tools, such as the sickle and the plow, retained their Neolithic design and were used all through the Bronze Age.

CONCLUSION

All of this suggests that seeing the Ubaid Neolithic cultures as less important than the first "civilized" cities is a mistake. 

The Ubaid culture and settlements need to be understood as early civilizations in themselves that set the tone for the later civilization's development, without which the early cities never could have emerged.

Another mistake is that the Ubaid Neolithic culture has often been dismissed as prehistory because it did not have a writing. Yet, thousands of years before the invention of writing, the Ubaid societies were creating a new way of living and surviving that was the foundation for the rise of what has been called the first civilizations, i.e., the first cities.

As I have shown, the first city, Uruk, did evolve directly from Neolithic Ubaid culture and technology. After that the influence of Uruk was immense as it became a model for later Mesopotamian cities and other cities.

This means our understanding and concepts of these eras, time periods, and transitions need to be reexamined. 

So, again I suggest the distinction between the Middle to Late Neolithic and the rise of the cities should be as follows:

Middle to Upper Neolithic = Civilization 1.0
Mesopotamia and Egypt   = Civilization 2.0


This is a fanciful, but perhaps not inaccurate, painting of a large ship made of reeds at the port of Eridu, considered to be one of the oldest cities in Mesopotamia, about 5000-6000 years ago. The ship as pictured is not unrealistic and was constructed using bundled reeds, a large version of coiled basket weaving techniques.



A basic map of Mesopotamian irrigation.
Postgate, J. Nicholas. Early Mesopotamia: Society and Economy at the dawn of history. Routledge: London and New York, 1992.
https://www.brown.edu/Departments/Joukowsky_Institute/courses/ancientneareast/files/9444529.ppt


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)