Showing posts with label winter solstice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label winter solstice. Show all posts

Saturday, August 10, 2024

Neolithic Concepts of Time & Nature

 THE NEOLITHIC MINDSET
A New Concept Of Time
A New Relation To The Natural Environment
By Rick Doble

Les Tres Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, Labors Of The Months 
(Circa. 1412 C.E.)
For almost 12,000 years the basic agriculture invented by the Neolithic cultures was practiced throughout the West. Here is an illustration from about 600 years ago. Notice the importance of the time of the month and the Zodiac at the top.

INTRODUCTION

While Neolithic cultures have been given credit for new important technologies such as agriculture and pottery, less has been understood about their new way of looking at the world. In a way, this mindset was more important than the technologies because it unleashed new and different ways of thinking and experimenting. This new point of view completed their cultural shift from their nomadic hunter-gatherer past when they foraged for food and lived in small tribes. With these new ideas and their new technology, they had invented a full and complete culture, which I argue was the beginning of civilization.

While most discussions of the Early Neolithic center on the practice of agriculture, a sedentary lifestyle, and the growth of small villages, there was something additional starting to emerge that was less tangible. A new concept of time was developing and a new way of relating to the natural world was taking place.

Understanding time was necessary because it was important for farmers to know the best times to plant and harvest. A new way of relating to the natural world meant that they could create a manmade environment rather than having to accept the environment that nature gave them. This last way of looking at the world gave them flexibility and also a new kind of freedom. They could invent and engineer all kinds of things that would have been unthinkable when they were living, as they had done for hundreds of thousands of years, in small tribes as nomadic hunter-gatherers. 

So in addition to creating villages, and growing grain, the Neolithic cultures developed a worldview that was very different from that of their ancestors' small tribes who had lived a life of foraging in the wild. This worldview, as I will describe next, was central to the Neolithic way of life. So the Neolithic Revolution was not just about technology and sedentary living but a totally new way of working with the world. 

And because what they had accomplished was so complete and so different, I suggest that this is when civilization began. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MY DEFINITION OF THE NEOLITHIC ERA:
The first stage of modern human behavior and modern societies which was the beginning of civilization. Large numbers of people lived in permanent houses and villages and developed agriculture instead of living in small tribes as nomadic hunter-gatherers which Homo sapiens had done for hundreds of thousands of years.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Middle to Late Neolithic  = Civilization 1.0
Egypt and Mesopotamia = Civilization 2.0

A NEW WAY OF LIVING WITH TIME

A new concept of time was one of three key elements that led to the success of the Neolithic way of life.
"Meillassoux’s work is fundamental here, for he has suggested that farmers must acquire a different sense of time from hunter gatherers (Meillassoux 1972)." 
"The attraction of Meillassoux’s (1972) work for archaeologists was the way in which it suggested that hunter gatherers and farmers might have possessed a different sense of time and place from one another."
(Bradley, Richard. The Significance Of Monuments) 

Many Stone Age researchers now agree that Neolithic people had a different sense of time from Paleolithic nomadic hunter-gatherers and this was significant. 

But I believe it was much more important than historians and researchers have realized. I think it was one of the three critical changes in the Neolithic era when it broke away from their previous nomadic hunter-gatherer way of life.

These three things were: agriculture, living in permanent houses in villages, and this new sense of time. Furthermore, I see these three things as intertwined. Agriculture, for example, required an understanding of yearly time, i.e., when to prepare the ground, when to plant, when to harvest, and how to store grain so that it lasted a long time and did not spoil.

Agriculture also required that people lived close by to tend the fields every day. And building a home required an understanding of linear time. A building needed to be imagined and designed for all four seasons, then the materials needed to be gathered, and finally the home needed to be built. This understanding of the step-by-step requirements of processes, which we might call 'process time', would be very important later on with the development of pottery, weaving, and many types of woven-reed items and structures such as boats and houses.

So these three elements were bound together each affecting the other. 

This different sense was a significant break with the Old Stone Age. It was another signal that the Neolithic era was not just a continuation of the Stone Age, but something quite different.

The immediacy of nomadic hunter-gatherers had been replaced with a conception of time that was modern. Time was not only of the moment. Time had a past, existed in the present, and would become something in the future. And this conception of time included an understanding of duration. Imagination also played a part as new homes or new pottery had to be imagined first before they were made.

-------------------
Developing A New Concept Of Time Was A Radical Break With The Past

"It must have required enormous effort
for man to overcome his natural tendency
to live like the animals in a continual present."
(Whitrow, Gerald James. Time in History)
It is very likely that the Paleolithic experience of time was quite different from out modern sense of time; it was immediate and of the moment. For example, we know from contemporary hunter-gatherers that when food is found it is eaten immediately, and saving food for times of scarcity does not happen. 

"Hunter-gatherers have little or no stored food, and no concentrated food sources, like an orchard or a herd of cows: they live off the wild plants and animals they obtain each day." (Diamond, The Worst Mistake...)

But the Neolithic concept of time changed that. Instead of time driving human behavior with its immediate demands of finding food, time could be managed. This required a sense of linear time with a past, present, future, and duration. This meant that agriculture, for example, could be planned. So time became a resource that could be controlled to some extent. 

There were two very different aspects to the Neolithic understanding of time. They needed to develop a new concept of linear time and they needed to create a way to measure time and/or accurately indicate time. 


A NEW CONCEPT OF TIME

Neolithic people needed a new concept of time. The immediate time of mobile hunter-gatherers was gone and was replaced with a yearly understanding of the seasons and how agriculture worked within the seasonal cycle. Once understood this allowed long-term planning within the cycle of a year. 

They also needed a sense of linear time when it came to working with processes. Processes need to be done in a linear fashion and there needs to be a clear idea of the steps involved in the process and the order of those steps. Agriculture was a process but so were many other Neolithic technologies. For example, pottery required many steps as did making linen cloth from flax.

So this sense of time was not just related to day-by-day time or yearly agricultural time; it included an understanding of linear time which allowed the creation, the organization, the planning, and the modification of processes such as making pottery or weaving linen. This planning could be applied to a variety of things which gave humans even more control.

This idea of the Neolithic era developing a different sense of time has been around for at least thirty years but it has not played a major role in our understanding of their culture. I would like to bring it front and center and make it one of the key factors that led to the development of Neolithic villages and their success.

-------------------
The Great Empires Of Mesopotamia And Egypt Continued This Sense Of Time And Developed It Further

When this sense of time was passed down to the great civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia, it was developed much further so that cities, for example, could coordinate and organize activities. This allowed urban areas to run smoothly. Mesopotamian cities and ancient Egypt civilizations could not have functioned without this new sense of time. Once time was conceived in this manner, it allowed sophisticated planning, coordination, and the all-important import of food and supplies, in a regular predictable manner, into the cities.

 A fanciful depiction of early civilized life in the Assyrian city of Nimrud ca. 1350 BCE.
From Myths and Legends of Babylonia & Assyria by Lewis Spence, 1910.

This is another example of a Neolithic innovation that was both essential and was not only continued by the great civilizations but developed and refined by them to much a higher degree. Eventually in Babylon, the divisions of time into hours, minutes, and seconds were invented and were passed on to us today.

-------------------
Because Our Sense Of Time Is Similar To The Neolithic Sense Of Time, 
It Is Hard To Understand How Radical This Change Was

We have all grown up with the idea that time has a past, present, future, and duration. We are taught this from the time we are born and again when we are in school. It is something we assume. 

But it is very likely that our early ancestors' experience of time was quite different; it was more immediate and more of the moment like the animals we had evolved from. For example, there is a hunter-gatherer tribe in the Amazon, the Piraha, that thinks and speaks of time only in terms of a couple of days.

A Piraha community. The Pirahas are hunter-gatherers who live in the Amazon.

See my article about language and time.

The idea of a long-term sense of time was another innovation of the Neolithic cultures. This sense of time was essential for agriculture. However, this major Neolithic innovation has gone largely unrecognized.


AN ACCURATE WAY OF INDICATING TIME

In addition to a new understanding of time, Neolithic people needed an accurate way to gauge seasonal time, since planting and harvesting depended on that. While we are still learning about their methods, we can say for certain that there were a number of structures that could indicate with some accuracy the time of the winter solstice. 

It has been confirmed by scientists that the Newgrange passage tomb in Ireland could indicate the time around the day of the winter solstice within a day or two. The winter solstice is very difficult to ascertain and now, scholars agree, that Newgrange was thousands of years ahead of its time. 


TOP: Diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light from the side.
BOTTOM: Overhead diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light.
(Irish Art History Section)




"Goseck circle, Germany 4900 - 4700 BC." 
(Antonsen, Kenny & Jimmy. Old Europe)

Many of the newly discovered 'circular enclosures' (above) in Northern Europe could also indicate the time around the winter solstice but probably with less accuracy than Newgrange.


A yearly Neolithic solar clock on the island of Malta.
"Schematic Angles in the Mnajdra Solar Temple in Malta."


On the island of Malta, a kind of yearly sun clock indicated the time of year.
“In the case of Neolithic astronomy, we are dealing not with the prehistory of science, but with science in prehistory.”
(McClellan, James E. III, Dorn, Harold. Science and Technology in World History)

-------------------
Evidence

While we do not have written records of their ideas and methods of timekeeping, we do have another kind of evidence. We have many monuments that were designed to indicate time and also evidence of extended Neolithic processes that would have required an understanding of time to implement. 


ANOTHER RADICAL NEOLITHIC IDEA:
A New Sense Of The Human Place In The World

Another important change in thought and attitude was a shift in the human relation to nature, an attitude that continues to this day.

A crucial drama of humanity was being played out in Neolithic villages. A new way of living was taking place along with an advancing technology, a new concept of time, and a new attitude toward the world. 

Human creatures were separating themselves from nature where they had lived for millions of years, and were creating their own space with its own rules. They were engineering their environment rather than accepting what nature offered -- unlike the rest of the animals. So it was not only a new way to live but a separation from their past and the natural world.

There is clear and unambiguous evidence that this way of thinking had occurred. 
In Genesis of the Judeo-Christian Old Testament, in the creation story the Lord says:
26 Then God said: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. Let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and the cattle, and over all the wild animals and all the creatures that crawl on the ground."
27 God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them, saying: "Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that move on the earth."
I believe the above passage is indicative of the Neolithic way of thinking. Neolithic people had come to believe they were above the animals and were separate from nature. So the Neolithic way of life was, in a sense, rejecting millions of years of survival based on nomadic hunting-and-gathering in the natural world, in favor of a totally new way of life that they invented.

The Peaceable Kingdom by Edward Hicks
While people believed they were superior to the animals,
they also wanted to live in harmony with the animal kingdom.

The above passage from Genesis is not the only evidence we have for these ideas. In Mesopotamia, the Warka Vase depicted the same idea in a hierarchy that placed humans near the top and above the animals and plants.

The Warka Vase
LEFT: Full photo of the vase
RIGHT: Detailed photo of each level.
"Warka vase, a slim alabaster vessel carved [with these images]...from bottom to top with: water, date palms, barley, and wheat, alternating rams and ewes, and men carrying baskets of foodstuffs to the goddess Inanna accepting the offerings."
The votive Vase of Warka, from Warka (ancient Uruk), Iraq. Jemdet Nasr period, 3000-2900 BCE. The Iraq Museum, Baghdad. 

The vase offers a complete view of the Sumerian view of the world. On the bottom are water and plants, next up are animals, then people, and finally the gods. Not unlike the story of Genesis, it placed humans above the animals but below the gods. 

In both narratives, it was clear that humans were superior to the animals and to nature.

Although the story of Genesis is probably older, it was not written down until about 1400 BCE. However, when Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden, Adam was forced to farm which suggests a Neolithic time period for the story originally.
Two translations of this passage:
New Living Translation (NLT) So the Lord God banished them from the Garden of Eden, and he sent Adam out to cultivate the ground from which he had been made. 
The King James Version (KJV) Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
Adam tilling the ground after his expulsion from Eden.
Detail from "The Story of Adam and Eve." Boucicaut Master (French, active about 1390 - 1430). Google Art Project.

-------------------
Examples of Humans Taking Control

We cannot know if this concept was articulated in the Neolithic era or only put into words and images later. But in any case, the Neolithic way of life did exhibit a definite break from the nomadic hunter-gatherer past when they had lived with nature. For example, the Neolithic domestication of plants and animals showed clearly that humans could and would take control of some plants and animals for their needs.



"The majority of the crops and vegetables of today were domesticated
from their wild progenitors within the past 12,000 years."
(Alseekh, Saleh et al. Domestication of Crop Metabolomes)

Smart Neolithic farmers "domesticated" their plants so that over time the plants produced much greater yields. Also, when possible, they chose aberrant strains of grains that kept their seeds on the stem rather than the normal natural way in which seeds fell off the stem and were blown with the wind. This made harvesting and processing grains much easier.

These last two Neolithic techniques show that Neolithic people had a different mindset than earlier nomadic hunter-gatherers. Neolithic farmers felt that they could 'engineer' nature with their skills, rather than accepting only what nature offered, as they had done when they lived in the wild. This is a clear example of the new way that Neolithic people were thinking.
"Domestication is the process by which farmers select for desirable traits by breeding successive generations of a plant or animal. Over time, a domestic species becomes different from its wild relative.
"Neolithic farmers selected for crops that harvested easily. Wild wheat, for instance, falls to the ground and shatters when it is ripe. Early humans bred for wheat that stayed on the stem for easier harvesting."
-------------------
The Neolithic Era Took Command

While animals had to adapt to the environment as they found it, humans were now attempting to create their own environment that was secure and comfortable.

For the first time in the history of hominins, humans engineered a full environment that was friendly to them. Villages, houses, roads, and fields along with the daily routine of tending the crops and making bread meant that these Neolithic humans had created a space that they could manage. Instead of hunting and gathering, these societies did not have to survive based on what they could forage. 

This way of looking at the world continues to this day in our air-conditioned homes with central heat, our all-weather roads, our all-weather automobiles, and a freezer full of food. 

But don't take my word for it. Here is a summary from a comprehensive study of the Neolithic.
"The Neolithic Revolution was ultimately necessary to the rise of modern civilization by creating the foundation for the later process of industrialization and sustained economic growth."
(Weisdorf, Jacob L. From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution.)
How and why it happened is still not clear. It is part of a heated ongoing debate. Yet we can be certain of one thing: it did happen and we are who we are and live as we do because it did happen.


DIFFERENT KINDS OF TIME
Long-Term Linear Time, Process Time, And Cyclical Time

Neolithic time marked the beginning of our modern concept of time, of long-term linear time, and time that is conceptualized as something that can be controlled. Time could now be planned or managed or used as a resource. Time did not just flow uncontrollably, it could be harnessed and used to human advantage. See my full article about this.

It is important to understand historically how this way of thinking took hold because these ideas have had serious consequences. For example, our ability to engineer our modern environment has led to the climate change crisis.   

It is my view that these Neolithic cultures saw 'big time' or cosmological time as cyclical. Sunrise to sunset, the phases of the moon, winter, spring, summer, fall, birth, and death were all cyclical. But within those cycles, humans could work with long-term linear time.

It is also my opinion that the spiral symbol(s) that appeared throughout the Neolithic era were an expression of that sense of cosmological time.

The famous Tri-Spiral in the chamber at Newgrange.

TOP: The large stone at the entrance to Newgrange
BOTTOM: A drawing of the large stone showing the spiral engravings.
(Coffey, George. Drawings of Newgrange)

For Neolithic people, there would have been many examples of long-term linear time within cyclical time. The seasons occurred in the same order every year. In early spring seeds were planted which then sprouted and grew through the summer and then were harvested in the fall. Agriculture was a process that had to be done in sequence. This was both a linear progression and also a cycle that repeated itself year after year. Preparing the soil, planting, and harvesting had to be done in the correct order and at the right times to ensure a bountiful harvest.

Once Neolithic cultures grasped how this linear time functioned within cyclical time, it opened the door to an understanding of processes in general. 

The spiral was a common symbol used throughout the Neolithic. This pottery is from Romania.
"Ceramics. 5th millennium BC. Cucuteni, (Romania). Museum of Prehistory and Early History, Berlin."


-------------------
Process Time

It appears that Neolithic people had mastered an understanding of processes, what I have called 'process time'. This is linear time that is an integral part of a process.

We know from the continual development of stone tools for millions of years that early hominins could learn, teach and develop processes that became increasingly more complicated. Neolithic people added to that understanding and developed a sophisticated sense of 'process time' which they used to develop and refine several technologies such as pottery and weaving.

Google Word Definition
Process:
-- a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end --

This short definition says it well. A process requires a series of actions under certain conditions in a sequence that must be learned and then executed. And at the same time, the practitioner must have a clear idea of the end result. This, among other things, requires a sense of time and procedure. It also requires planning. In addition, knowledge of a process must be taught to the next generation if the use of the process is to continue.


POTTERY

A good example of this is pottery. It took a long time to develop the right process for making pottery, probably several thousand years, but they eventually figured it out.

LEFT: Cucuteni (a Neolithic Culture) kiln reconstruction 
Art Museum, Piatra Neamt, Romania. The invention of the kiln was as important as the invention of pottery. It allowed high sustained temperatures which later would be modified for the smelting of metals.
RIGHT: A Neolithic (Ubaid) pottery jar in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Dated to about 4500-4000 BCE, it is from Southern Iraq in the Late Ubaid period. 

"Pottery art is a complex and time-consuming process that presupposes a knowledge of all its stages: choice of suitable clay, removal of impurities (manually or by sieving) and clay preparation...and firing at a temperature up to 850-900 Celsius (1562-1652 Fahrenheit)"
(Hellenic Foundation, Neolithic Pottery)

Based on detailed information from the visual-arts-cork.com pottery timeline, virtually all pottery/ceramics fundamentals had been invented in the Neolithic, including tourneys/tournettes which were early potter's wheels (4700 BCE). 
(Visual-Arts-Cork, Pottery Timeline)

Pottery from the Neolithic Ubaid period in the British Museum
Unlike other types of plastic art, pottery was invented then lost, then reinvented then lost again, before finally becoming established around the world during the Neolithic period (c.8000-2000 BCE).
Visual-Arts-Cork. "Pottery Timeline (c.26,000 BCE - 1900)." Encyclopedia Of Art. 
The invention of pottery kilns and their ability to reach high sustained temperatures that had been achieved in the Neolithic era became the foundation for metallurgy which would not have been possible without it. So Neolithic skills also created a critical part of the later metal technology of copper, bronze, and iron over the next several thousand years.

-------------------
More About Process Time

There were many other items and skills that required 'process time' thinking such as making boats out of reeds, for example, or cloth from flax, or houses from reeds, or a wide variety of baskets.

The remarkable quality and sophistication of many late Neolithic technologies means that they had a full understanding of process time.


CONCLUSION
The Domestication of Time

Developing a sense of linear time was critical for the control that Neolithic societies needed. Illusive time was now something that could be managed to some degree. Agriculture required this sense of time on a yearly and monthly basis. And understanding time was also critical to refining the various processes that they worked with, such as pottery. 

They had taken control not only by engineering a new manmade environment but by 'domesticating' time itself.

By the middle of the Neolithic era, the different societies had mastered the basic necessities of life: food, clothing, and shelter. In addition, they had a worldview that they were comfortable with and a new sense of their place and time on this Earth.

I believe this was the start of civilization.


___________________________________
AFTERWORD


WEAVING, TEXTILES AND CLOTHING


Linum usitatissimum (Flax)
One of the founder plants, flax was/is used for fiber, food, fodder, and oil. It was used to make linen, linseed oil, and a variety of other products.

-------------------
Weaving Fabric
The famous Anni Albers of the Bauhaus School had this to say.
"During the 4,500 years or, in some estimates, even 8,000 years that we believe mankind has been weaving, the process itself has been unaffected by the various devices that contributed to greater speed of execution. We still deal in weaving, as at the time of its beginning, with a rigid set of parallel threads in tension and a mobile one that transverses it at right-angles."
This basic insight about right-angles has never been overshadowed. Anni Albers went on to say, "And weaving, even the most elaborate, can be done, given time, with a minimum of equipment...Fabrics of great accuracy have been executed without much mechanical aid."
(Albers, On Weaving)

LEFT: Reconstruction of a Neolithic loom around the time that Otzi, the Neolithic frozen 'ice man' natural mummy, was alive (ca. 3300 BCE), 
RIGHT: Clothing woven by this loom, archeoParc in Schnals, South Tyrol, Italy.
(archeoParc Val Senales - Ötzi Museum) 

"The warp-weighted loom uses a system of holding the warp threads parallel under tension by tying them in small bunches to weights made of stone, pottery or metal. From the beginning of Western history until the Middle Ages, the main weaving tool was this type of loom. LOOM WEIGHTS HAVE BEEN FOUND IN CATALHOYUK, AN ANCIENT CITY IN ANATOLIA THAT DATES TO 7000 BCE, [ED: My emphasis] and use of the warp-weighted loom persists to the present day in part of Norway. Although its particular form has varied through the ages and by locality, its essential parts remained the same.
The loom consists of two vertical uprights, a horizontal warp beam, a shed rod, a heddle rod, and weights. The warp threads are tied to the horizontal beam at the top and hang down vertically towards the ground. The weights, in this case, made of clay, are then attached to the ends of the warp threads, which are then grouped together and tied so that the spun threads don't untwist.
The warp-weighted loom greatly increased weaving efficiency and allowed weavers to create huge, magnificent works and tapestries."
(Smith College, Museum of Ancient Inventions)

 

 -------------------
Making Linen

Filax had to be carefully planted and harvested, next, there were complicated procedures to extract fiber from the flax plant, then the fiber had to be spun into thread and finally woven on a Neolithic loom. The last step was to cut and sew the cloth to make a garment.
5,000 Years Of Making Linen: The History Of Neolithic Flax Processing
"Archaeobotanists Ursula Maier and Helmut Schlichtherle reported evidence of the technological development of making cloth from the flax plant (called linen). [ED: during the Neolithic]
"Making cloth from flax is not a straightforward process.
"Flax is a bast fiber plant--meaning the fiber is collected from the inner bark of the plant--which must undergo a complex set of processes to separate the fiber from the woodier outer parts.
"They report that evidence for Alpine lake house [Neolithic] flax fiber production includes tools (spindles, spindle whorls, hatchets), finished products (nets, textiles, fabrics, even shoes, and hats)...They discovered, amazingly enough, that flax production techniques at these ancient sites were not dissimilar from that used everywhere in the world through the early 20th century."
(Hirst, 5,000 Years of Making Linen)
Click on the next link to see detailed descriptions of the 12 steps that are typically involved in the process of making linen from flax. 


THE NEOLITHIC LEGACY 
TO THE FIRST GREAT CIVILIZATIONS

I have made the point that the great civilizations could not have emerged without the foundation of advanced Neolithic technology. For this reason I believe that civilization started in the Middle Neolithic. Here are two examples of basic Neolithic technologies that were crucial for the rise of the great civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. 

While often overlooked, both the Mesopotamians and the Egyptians depended on huge numbers of woven-fiber sacks for holding and transporting grain. Weaving was perfected in the Neolithic era and made the manufacture of sacks available.


LEFT: Picture from the Sumerian Standard of Ur.
of a person carrying a sack, circa 2600 BCE.
RIGHT: Picture of an Egyptian carrying a sack
from Tombe d'Oumsou, circa 1450 BCE.
Ancient Egyptian model of a granary with scribes.
This model was found in a tomb and shows men delivering grain in woven sacks which is being recorded by scribes.



Building a temple with the best quality fired bricks. The Neolithic domesticated donkeys and the Neolithic double-sided pannier baskets were essential for the construction of buildings in Mesopotamia.

_________________________________
FOOTNOTES

Albers, Anni. On Weaving: New Expanded Edition. Princeton University Press, Oct 24, 2017, page 4.

Alseekh, Saleh et al. Domestication of Crop Metabolomes: Desired and Unintended Consequences. Trends in Plant Science, Volume 26, Issue 6, 2021, Pages 650-661, ISSN 1360-1385.

Antonsen, Kenny & Jimmy. Old Europe - First Civilization 7000-3000 BC. In Danish.

archeoParc Val Senales - Ötzi Museum
Museum based on the Neolithic frozen natural mummy Ötzi, also called The Iceman, who lived between 3350 and 3105 BC in Europe.

Bradley, Richard. The Significance Of Monuments: On the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge, 1998.

Coffey, George. Drawings of Newgrange from the late 1800s. Published in: The Dolmens of Ireland,, by William Copeland Borlase. Published by the University of Michigan Library (January 1, 1897).

Diamond, Jared, UCLA School of Medicine. "The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race" Discover Magazine, May 1987, pp. 64—66.

Hirst, K. Kris. "5,000 Years of Making Linen: The History of Neolithic Flax Processing." Thoughtco.com, May 20, 2019. https://www.thoughtco.com/making-linen-history-neolithic-flax-processing-171347

Irish Art History Section, Professional Development Service for Teachers, P.D.S.T., Ireland.

McClellan, James E. III, Dorn, Harold. Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction, Edition 2.
Johns Hopkins University Press; 2nd edition (April 14, 2006).

Smith College, Museum of Ancient Inventions.
The Warp-Weighted Loom, Worldwide, 7000 BCE
by Kristy Beauchesne, Sun Eoh and Kate McClosky.
Museum of Ancient Inventions
The Virtual Museum of Ancient Inventions 
Smith College, History of Science

Visual-Arts-Cork. "Pottery Timeline (c.26,000 BCE - 1900)." Encyclopedia Of Art. http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/pottery-timeline.htm

Weisdorf, Jacob L. (September 2005). "From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution" (PDF). Journal of Economic Surveys. 19 (4): 561–586. doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00259.x. S2CID 42777045. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2023.

Whitrow, Gerald James. Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press. 1988, page 22.


Monday, January 22, 2024

Scientific test: Newgrange solstice indicator

A PROPOSAL:

HOW TO SCIENTIFICALLY TEST 
THE PRECISION AND ACCURACY
OF THE NEOLITHIC WINTER SOLSTICE DETECTOR 
AT NEWGRANGE, IRELAND
By Rick Doble

Diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light from the side.
(Irish Art History Section, Professional Development Service for Teachers, P.D.S.T., Ireland)

INTRODUCTION

It is my belief that the passageway and specially designed baffled 'roof-box' at Newgrange Ireland could determine the specific day of the Winter Solstice in real time. And if this is true, it means that this Neolithic science was thousands of years ahead of its time and more advanced, in this regard, than Greek or Roman astronomy. Today we now have the tools to test this hypothesis scientifically. Later in this article, I spell out ways that it could be tested.

When the Winter Solstice sunrise lit the passageway at Newgrange Ireland around the time of the solstice, it probably had religious and ritual significance. However, it is important to understand that the Newgrange structure was also a scientific instrument. It accurately 'captured' the Winter Solstice light using the well-crafted baffled roof-box that lit the carefully made passageway inside the structure and only did so when the sunrise was close to the day of the solstice. And when it did capture this sunlight, it magnified it. 

It is not well understood today but determining the day of the Winter Solstice in real time was virtually impossible until recently. For almost a week there is only a slight difference in the sunrise position on the horizon, the length of the days only vary by seconds and atmospheric refraction can distort observation. So, at the time of the winter solstice, the sun barely moves (i.e., the sun's declination). In fact the word solstice comes from the Latin 'solstitium' meaning "point at which the sun seems to stand still" (dictionary.com). Please see the Afterword for more detail. 

The Greeks and Romans could and did determine the day of the solstice after the fact by observing the position of the sun many days before and after the time of the solstice and then interpolating the actual day. However, they could not determine the actual day in real time. 

Nevertheless, I believe the clever baffled roof-box and magnification of the light at Newgrange may have been enough to allow Neolithic experts to determine the exact day of the solstice in real time. 

NOTE: Since the roof-box could capture sunrise light from about two days before the day of the solstice and two days after, some have interpreted this to mean that these Neolithic people were only interested in an approximate identification of the time of the solstice and not the exact day (see the following quote). I feel this is a mistake. It is my contention that each day before, during, and after the solstice could be identified individually. But cloudy days would have caused a problem. Yet with five days to work with, there was almost always at least one clear day that could be identified and used to calculate the actual day.

CURRENT OPINION DOES NOT AGREE
THAT THE DAY OF THE WINTER SOLSTICE 
COULD BE DETERMINED IN REAL TIME

As I write this article there is agreement by experts that the time *around* the Winter Solstice could be indicated by Newgrange, but that's as much as they are willing to say.

The current opinion about the accuracy of Newgrange is expressed by T. P. Ray in his article about Newgrange. "Megalithic man was interested in marking the southern limits in declination of the sun and moon, albeit approximately. Such low accuracies suggest that ancient man's interest in these bodies may have been ritualistic rather than for the purpose of calendar construction."
Ray, T. P. The winter solstice phenomenon at Newgrange, Ireland: accident or design?  School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.

But, as I have said, I believe that careful testing will show that Newgrange was quite accurate and could determine the day of the Winter Solstice in real time. I think that my hypothesis can be scientifically tested. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM THE MEDIA ABOUT THE PRECISION OF NEWGRANGE

Ireland, 3200 B.C.
On roughly four days every year, the Winter Solstice sun pokes through the top of this Stone Age monument and onto the floor of the interior chamber, filling the ancient temple with light for about 17 minutes. Built before Stonehenge, Newgrange was likely used to track the passing of the years with a precision ahead of its time. With an earthen mound and stone forming passageways and chambers inside Newgrange, the site likely also served as a passage tomb and ceremonial location as well as being a highly engineered clock.
Newcombup, Tim. Popular Mechanics, September 30, 2022.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a35867403/ancient-architecture/

The Winter Solstice Light December 2013.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Solstice_Newgrange.jpg


GENERAL IDEAS AND CONCERNS
FOR A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY
OF THE SOLSTICE INDICATORS AT NEWGRANGE:


Nine years ago I wrote an article stating that it was possible that the passage tomb at Newgrange could determine the day of the Winter Solstice in real time. This article was reprinted in Newgrange.com. Now I believe new technology could, in fact, provide hard proof.

I think a university archaeological program or other such research group should write a proposal and get funding for a project that will prove or disprove the precision of the Newgrange passageway and roof-box.  

NEW TECHNOLOGY & ARCHEOLOGY 2.0: 
Today, using the tools of Archeology 2.0 such as photogrammetry and computer simulations, this could be studied with extreme precision. Photogrammetry is now capable of making a precise 3D computer representation, accurate to millimeters. Then simulations of the sunrise light on the day of the Winter Solstice plus simulations of the days before and after the time of the solstice could show how each particular sunrise was being displayed in the passageway.

It is my guess that for two days before the Winter Solstice and two days after the light was distinctly different from the exact day of the solstice light. Furthermore, thee days surrounding the day of the solstice were distinctly different from each other. I also believe there was a reason for knowing the characteristics of the light in the days before and after. If the sky was cloudy on the day of the solstice, the day itself could still be determined by knowing the characteristics of the other days around the time of the solstice, and knowing which day was which.

Detailed drawing of Newgrange passage showing the precise placement of stones and the shaft of solstice light. Used with permission:
http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/irelandnewgrange.htm 

As I point out in my article, the setup at Newgrange with the roof-box and passageway yielded a lot of information such as the width of the light, the intensity of the light, the speed of the light as it moved down the passageway and retreated, the furthest reach of the light, the way that the stone walls and spiral engravings were lit, etc. The design magnifies the light and its movement -- and magnifications yield much more information. I believe that this amount of information would be enough to distinguish one day from another.

Another important point is the time of each sunrise before, during, and after the solstice. The times would be different and could possibly be detected based on the position of the stars.

While making a computer model of the passageway is, today, not all that difficult, simulating the solstice light could be quite difficult. Because, for this kind of simulation, the most important element will be the precision of the light coming through the roof-box and the way this simulated sunlight lights up the passageway. This must be as accurate as possible otherwise the project is pointless. 

Passage leading towards chamber of Newgrange passage tomb in Ireland.
Passage leading out from chamber of Newgrange passage tomb in Ireland.

The angle of the light is especially important as there is a very slight change in that angle with each sunrise. When the light is magnified and enters the passageway at a low angle in relation to the stone walls that make up the passageway, there could be a marked difference from day to day. I am a professional photographer who has written three books on photography. I know that the angle of light in relation to the surface of an object can reveal subtle details that can be quite different with just a small change in the angle of light.

State-of-the-art composite videos, made from dozens of cameras placed along the passageway during the time of the solstice, could be used as a reference both in the timing and the accuracy of the shaft of light. This might be the best way to ensure that the simulated light matches the actual light around the time of the solstice.

Also when building a model, it is also important to take into account the change in the sun's position about 5000 years ago. See NASA's assessment next:

Today the first light enters about four minutes after sunrise, but calculations based on the precession of the Earth show that 5,000 years ago, first light would have entered exactly at sunrise.
Document of the US space agency NASA. 
https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/SED11/P8Newgrange.pdf

All solar simulations should match the earlier times of sunrise, when Newgrange was functioning, based on NASA's calculations.


Triple spiral carved in a stone in the chamber at the end of the passage. According to legend, the light from the sun illuminated these triple spirals on the day of the solstice. 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Celtic_spiral.jpg

SPECIFIC WAYS TO TEST MY HYPOTHESES


HOW TO TEST:
Once the photogrammetric and computer simulation of the solstice light are created, it may be possible to objectively test the ability of the Newgrange passageway and roof-box to indicate the day of the Winter Solstice.

While I am hardly an expert when it comes to designing experiments, here are suggestions about how this could be tested.

PLAN A:
A number of professional people (I would suggest photographers or people who work with lighting) could view a simulated computer sequence of light coming into the passageway and then retreating with each day clearly labeled. I suggest using professionals because we can assume that the Neolithic viewers of these sequences were also professionals. After today's viewers have become familiar with these sequences, they could then be tested by viewing each sequence at random without a label and stating which sequence it was. 

PLAN B:
Another way to test this could be to make a large light that would accurately simulate the angle, the movement and the brightness of the Winter Solstice sunrise, along with the sunrise light from the two days before and after. This light would shine through the roof-box and down the actual passageway. As with Plan A, experts could, at first, view the light in a clearly labeled sequence. Then experts could be positioned in the passageway as the light was shown at random to see if they could tell the difference. 

THE FINAL RESULT:
Based on the correctness of the experts' ability to distinguish between these random showings, a scorecard could be created that would tell us whether they were able to identify the day of the solstice and if they were able to distinguish between the days before and after the solstice.

PLAN C:
A stand-alone computer model could be created. Then a computer rating system could be devised that would rate each one of the lighting effects every 15 seconds such as the width of the light, the speed of the light's movement up the passageway, the length of the shadows, the depth or darkness of the shadows, the illumination on the walls, etc. Then the furthest reach of the light would be logged and followed by a rating of these same characteristics as the light retreated. The final task would be to put this data altogether to determine if there was a significant difference from day to day.

PLAN D:
A combination of the above or another approach I have not thought of.

MY ARTICLE:
As I said, in 2015 I wrote an article which has been reprinted in the Newgrange.com website, about the accuracy of the Newgrange passageway in determining the Winter Solstice.

Computing the Winter Solstice at Newgrange:
Was Neolithic Science Equal To or Better Than Ancient Greek or Roman Science?

THE DISCOVERY PROGRAMME "3D MODEL OF SOLSTICE AT NEWGRANGE":
The Discovery Programme in Ireland has already made a "3d Model Of Solstice At Newgrange". 


Overhead diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light.
(Irish Art History Section, Professional Development Service for Teachers, P.D.S.T., Ireland)

PUTTING A PROPOSAL AND STUDY TOGETHER


HERE IS WHAT I SUGGEST: 
An archaeological or research program should write a specific proposal and acquire funding. I have written a number of proposals in the past and would be glad to write a suggested draft of the proposal. Or I could work together with members of an academic team. I can also write the finished draft. After that I would be glad to work on the project if it is funded in any manner that would be helpful.

HOW I SHOULD BE CREDITED:
I would need to be credited for the idea if it is put together and also for writing the proposal if I do some or all of the writing. If the proposal is accepted, I would be glad to work with people in the project.

MY INTEREST:
I have a Master's Degree in Communication with a minor in Anthropology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, plus a B.A. in English with Honors in Creative Writing, also from UNC-CH.
I am an independent researcher who is interested in this subject because I have been writing a blog for over eleven years about the human experience of time. I have always felt that ancient people were much smarter than they have been given credit for and also that a concept of time was very important to them. So, when I studied Newgrange, I felt that I had found an important example of these ideas.

PLEASE NOTE:
While other people have suggested that the Newgrange design could determine the day of the Winter Solstice in real time, I do not believe they have gone into detail nearly as much as I have to make the case. For example, I have covered the difficulty of measuring the day of the solstice, the design and construction of the roof-box and passageway as a scientific instrument, its ability to magnify the sunlight's angle and movement and the wealth of information that resulted.

As I have said the Greeks and Romans could not determine the day of the Winter Solstice in real time. In my 2015 article, I believe I am the first person to make this point. They could determine it after the fact but not in real time. The Roman Saturnalia Festival, for example, occurred during the week of the solstice but it did not celebrate a particular solstice day. 
 
So this means that in this particular case at least, in Ireland and during the Winter Solstice, Neolithic science and technology might have been more advanced that of the Greeks and Roman's 3000 years later. And if this is true, it signals a major change in our perception of Neolithic culture and its level of technology.

"Sketch of a cross section of the Newgrange passage grave
made by William Frederick Wakeman."
Quote from commons.wikimedia.org
Wakeman's Handbook of Irish Antiquities (1903). p. 85.
 http://www.archive.org/details/wakemanshandbook00wake


_______________________________
AFTERWORD

PLEASE SEE MY FULL DETAILED ARTICLE IN THIS BLOG

ABOUT THE WINTER SOLSTICE IN GREECE AND ROME

I have made the point in many other articles that prehistoric people were smarter than previously thought and they did remarkable things when they were necessary. The very short winter days in Ireland meant that knowing the day of the Winter Solstice was important as it signaled the beginning of the new year and so allowed accurate yearly planning for agriculture. 

In Greece and Rome the days were much longer in the winter and the weather less severe, so they did not feel the same urgency.

SCIENCE IN THE NEOLITHIC ERA

“In the case of Neolithic astronomy, we are dealing
not with the prehistory of science,
but with science in prehistory.”
McClellan, James E. III, Dorn, Harold. Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction, Edition 2. JHU Press, June 2006, page 23. 

I believe the specially designed baffled roof-box and passageway at Newgrange created a well developed scientific instrument. Furthermore, the alignment of the entire structure with the Winter Solstice sunrise was precise. Plus the well constructed structure provided a reliable environment that was stable and consistent year after year. 

“Measure what can be measured, and make measurable what cannot be.”
Galileo Galilei

The creation of the solid passageway, walls, floor and ceiling meant that there were clear consistent points that allowed a comparison of the light from one day to the next and one year to the next. And comparison is one way to measure.

One of the standard requirements of experimental science is to eliminate all variables other than the phenomena that is bing studied so that the outcome is due to the experiment and nothing more. The Newgrange baffled roof-box and passageway provided an unmovable stable environment so that the manipulation of the light by the Newgrange instrument on consecutive days could be reliably compared.

[Left} The special roof-box is on top above the passageway. During the winter solstice, it is light through the roof-box that illuminates the passageway NOT light from the passageway entrance.
[Right] Close-up of the roof-box. It is set back so that the walls act like a baffle and only allow light through the roof-box during the solstice.


PERSONAL NOTE
As I was studying pictures of Newgrange and the solstice light, it struck me that several very modern devices have used/use a beam of light in a similar was. A beam of light shown down a long pathway was used in Newgrange but also in the famous Michelson-Morley experiment that proved Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity plus the very modern Gravity Wave detectors that have just proved Einsteins ideas about gravity in his General Theory of Relativity.