Showing posts with label timekeeping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label timekeeping. Show all posts

Saturday, August 10, 2024

Neolithic Concepts of Time & Nature

 THE NEOLITHIC MINDSET
A New Concept Of Time
A New Relation To The Natural Environment
By Rick Doble

Les Tres Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, Labors Of The Months 
(Circa. 1412 C.E.)
For almost 12,000 years the basic agriculture invented by the Neolithic cultures was practiced throughout the West. Here is an illustration from about 600 years ago. Notice the importance of the time of the month and the Zodiac at the top.

INTRODUCTION

While Neolithic cultures have been given credit for new important technologies such as agriculture and pottery, less has been understood about their new way of looking at the world. In a way, this mindset was more important than the technologies because it unleashed new and different ways of thinking and experimenting. This new point of view completed their cultural shift from their nomadic hunter-gatherer past when they foraged for food and lived in small tribes. With these new ideas and their new technology, they had invented a full and complete culture, which I argue was the beginning of civilization.

While most discussions of the Early Neolithic center on the practice of agriculture, a sedentary lifestyle, and the growth of small villages, there was something additional starting to emerge that was less tangible. A new concept of time was developing and a new way of relating to the natural world was taking place.

Understanding time was necessary because it was important for farmers to know the best times to plant and harvest. A new way of relating to the natural world meant that they could create a manmade environment rather than having to accept the environment that nature gave them. This last way of looking at the world gave them flexibility and also a new kind of freedom. They could invent and engineer all kinds of things that would have been unthinkable when they were living, as they had done for hundreds of thousands of years, in small tribes as nomadic hunter-gatherers. 

So in addition to creating villages, and growing grain, the Neolithic cultures developed a worldview that was very different from that of their ancestors' small tribes who had lived a life of foraging in the wild. This worldview, as I will describe next, was central to the Neolithic way of life. So the Neolithic Revolution was not just about technology and sedentary living but a totally new way of working with the world. 

And because what they had accomplished was so complete and so different, I suggest that this is when civilization began. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MY DEFINITION OF THE NEOLITHIC ERA:
The first stage of modern human behavior and modern societies which was the beginning of civilization. Large numbers of people lived in permanent houses and villages and developed agriculture instead of living in small tribes as nomadic hunter-gatherers which Homo sapiens had done for hundreds of thousands of years.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Middle to Late Neolithic  = Civilization 1.0
Egypt and Mesopotamia = Civilization 2.0

A NEW WAY OF LIVING WITH TIME

A new concept of time was one of three key elements that led to the success of the Neolithic way of life.
"Meillassoux’s work is fundamental here, for he has suggested that farmers must acquire a different sense of time from hunter gatherers (Meillassoux 1972)." 
"The attraction of Meillassoux’s (1972) work for archaeologists was the way in which it suggested that hunter gatherers and farmers might have possessed a different sense of time and place from one another."
(Bradley, Richard. The Significance Of Monuments) 

Many Stone Age researchers now agree that Neolithic people had a different sense of time from Paleolithic nomadic hunter-gatherers and this was significant. 

But I believe it was much more important than historians and researchers have realized. I think it was one of the three critical changes in the Neolithic era when it broke away from their previous nomadic hunter-gatherer way of life.

These three things were: agriculture, living in permanent houses in villages, and this new sense of time. Furthermore, I see these three things as intertwined. Agriculture, for example, required an understanding of yearly time, i.e., when to prepare the ground, when to plant, when to harvest, and how to store grain so that it lasted a long time and did not spoil.

Agriculture also required that people lived close by to tend the fields every day. And building a home required an understanding of linear time. A building needed to be imagined and designed for all four seasons, then the materials needed to be gathered, and finally the home needed to be built. This understanding of the step-by-step requirements of processes, which we might call 'process time', would be very important later on with the development of pottery, weaving, and many types of woven-reed items and structures such as boats and houses.

So these three elements were bound together each affecting the other. 

This different sense was a significant break with the Old Stone Age. It was another signal that the Neolithic era was not just a continuation of the Stone Age, but something quite different.

The immediacy of nomadic hunter-gatherers had been replaced with a conception of time that was modern. Time was not only of the moment. Time had a past, existed in the present, and would become something in the future. And this conception of time included an understanding of duration. Imagination also played a part as new homes or new pottery had to be imagined first before they were made.

-------------------
Developing A New Concept Of Time Was A Radical Break With The Past

"It must have required enormous effort
for man to overcome his natural tendency
to live like the animals in a continual present."
(Whitrow, Gerald James. Time in History)
It is very likely that the Paleolithic experience of time was quite different from out modern sense of time; it was immediate and of the moment. For example, we know from contemporary hunter-gatherers that when food is found it is eaten immediately, and saving food for times of scarcity does not happen. 

"Hunter-gatherers have little or no stored food, and no concentrated food sources, like an orchard or a herd of cows: they live off the wild plants and animals they obtain each day." (Diamond, The Worst Mistake...)

But the Neolithic concept of time changed that. Instead of time driving human behavior with its immediate demands of finding food, time could be managed. This required a sense of linear time with a past, present, future, and duration. This meant that agriculture, for example, could be planned. So time became a resource that could be controlled to some extent. 

There were two very different aspects to the Neolithic understanding of time. They needed to develop a new concept of linear time and they needed to create a way to measure time and/or accurately indicate time. 


A NEW CONCEPT OF TIME

Neolithic people needed a new concept of time. The immediate time of mobile hunter-gatherers was gone and was replaced with a yearly understanding of the seasons and how agriculture worked within the seasonal cycle. Once understood this allowed long-term planning within the cycle of a year. 

They also needed a sense of linear time when it came to working with processes. Processes need to be done in a linear fashion and there needs to be a clear idea of the steps involved in the process and the order of those steps. Agriculture was a process but so were many other Neolithic technologies. For example, pottery required many steps as did making linen cloth from flax.

So this sense of time was not just related to day-by-day time or yearly agricultural time; it included an understanding of linear time which allowed the creation, the organization, the planning, and the modification of processes such as making pottery or weaving linen. This planning could be applied to a variety of things which gave humans even more control.

This idea of the Neolithic era developing a different sense of time has been around for at least thirty years but it has not played a major role in our understanding of their culture. I would like to bring it front and center and make it one of the key factors that led to the development of Neolithic villages and their success.

-------------------
The Great Empires Of Mesopotamia And Egypt Continued This Sense Of Time And Developed It Further

When this sense of time was passed down to the great civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia, it was developed much further so that cities, for example, could coordinate and organize activities. This allowed urban areas to run smoothly. Mesopotamian cities and ancient Egypt civilizations could not have functioned without this new sense of time. Once time was conceived in this manner, it allowed sophisticated planning, coordination, and the all-important import of food and supplies, in a regular predictable manner, into the cities.

 A fanciful depiction of early civilized life in the Assyrian city of Nimrud ca. 1350 BCE.
From Myths and Legends of Babylonia & Assyria by Lewis Spence, 1910.

This is another example of a Neolithic innovation that was both essential and was not only continued by the great civilizations but developed and refined by them to much a higher degree. Eventually in Babylon, the divisions of time into hours, minutes, and seconds were invented and were passed on to us today.

-------------------
Because Our Sense Of Time Is Similar To The Neolithic Sense Of Time, 
It Is Hard To Understand How Radical This Change Was

We have all grown up with the idea that time has a past, present, future, and duration. We are taught this from the time we are born and again when we are in school. It is something we assume. 

But it is very likely that our early ancestors' experience of time was quite different; it was more immediate and more of the moment like the animals we had evolved from. For example, there is a hunter-gatherer tribe in the Amazon, the Piraha, that thinks and speaks of time only in terms of a couple of days.

A Piraha community. The Pirahas are hunter-gatherers who live in the Amazon.

See my article about language and time.

The idea of a long-term sense of time was another innovation of the Neolithic cultures. This sense of time was essential for agriculture. However, this major Neolithic innovation has gone largely unrecognized.


AN ACCURATE WAY OF INDICATING TIME

In addition to a new understanding of time, Neolithic people needed an accurate way to gauge seasonal time, since planting and harvesting depended on that. While we are still learning about their methods, we can say for certain that there were a number of structures that could indicate with some accuracy the time of the winter solstice. 

It has been confirmed by scientists that the Newgrange passage tomb in Ireland could indicate the time around the day of the winter solstice within a day or two. The winter solstice is very difficult to ascertain and now, scholars agree, that Newgrange was thousands of years ahead of its time. 


TOP: Diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light from the side.
BOTTOM: Overhead diagram of Newgrange passage and solstice light.
(Irish Art History Section)




"Goseck circle, Germany 4900 - 4700 BC." 
(Antonsen, Kenny & Jimmy. Old Europe)

Many of the newly discovered 'circular enclosures' (above) in Northern Europe could also indicate the time around the winter solstice but probably with less accuracy than Newgrange.


A yearly Neolithic solar clock on the island of Malta.
"Schematic Angles in the Mnajdra Solar Temple in Malta."


On the island of Malta, a kind of yearly sun clock indicated the time of year.
“In the case of Neolithic astronomy, we are dealing not with the prehistory of science, but with science in prehistory.”
(McClellan, James E. III, Dorn, Harold. Science and Technology in World History)

-------------------
Evidence

While we do not have written records of their ideas and methods of timekeeping, we do have another kind of evidence. We have many monuments that were designed to indicate time and also evidence of extended Neolithic processes that would have required an understanding of time to implement. 


ANOTHER RADICAL NEOLITHIC IDEA:
A New Sense Of The Human Place In The World

Another important change in thought and attitude was a shift in the human relation to nature, an attitude that continues to this day.

A crucial drama of humanity was being played out in Neolithic villages. A new way of living was taking place along with an advancing technology, a new concept of time, and a new attitude toward the world. 

Human creatures were separating themselves from nature where they had lived for millions of years, and were creating their own space with its own rules. They were engineering their environment rather than accepting what nature offered -- unlike the rest of the animals. So it was not only a new way to live but a separation from their past and the natural world.

There is clear and unambiguous evidence that this way of thinking had occurred. 
In Genesis of the Judeo-Christian Old Testament, in the creation story the Lord says:
26 Then God said: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. Let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and the cattle, and over all the wild animals and all the creatures that crawl on the ground."
27 God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them, saying: "Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that move on the earth."
I believe the above passage is indicative of the Neolithic way of thinking. Neolithic people had come to believe they were above the animals and were separate from nature. So the Neolithic way of life was, in a sense, rejecting millions of years of survival based on nomadic hunting-and-gathering in the natural world, in favor of a totally new way of life that they invented.

The Peaceable Kingdom by Edward Hicks
While people believed they were superior to the animals,
they also wanted to live in harmony with the animal kingdom.

The above passage from Genesis is not the only evidence we have for these ideas. In Mesopotamia, the Warka Vase depicted the same idea in a hierarchy that placed humans near the top and above the animals and plants.

The Warka Vase
LEFT: Full photo of the vase
RIGHT: Detailed photo of each level.
"Warka vase, a slim alabaster vessel carved [with these images]...from bottom to top with: water, date palms, barley, and wheat, alternating rams and ewes, and men carrying baskets of foodstuffs to the goddess Inanna accepting the offerings."
The votive Vase of Warka, from Warka (ancient Uruk), Iraq. Jemdet Nasr period, 3000-2900 BCE. The Iraq Museum, Baghdad. 

The vase offers a complete view of the Sumerian view of the world. On the bottom are water and plants, next up are animals, then people, and finally the gods. Not unlike the story of Genesis, it placed humans above the animals but below the gods. 

In both narratives, it was clear that humans were superior to the animals and to nature.

Although the story of Genesis is probably older, it was not written down until about 1400 BCE. However, when Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden, Adam was forced to farm which suggests a Neolithic time period for the story originally.
Two translations of this passage:
New Living Translation (NLT) So the Lord God banished them from the Garden of Eden, and he sent Adam out to cultivate the ground from which he had been made. 
The King James Version (KJV) Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
Adam tilling the ground after his expulsion from Eden.
Detail from "The Story of Adam and Eve." Boucicaut Master (French, active about 1390 - 1430). Google Art Project.

-------------------
Examples of Humans Taking Control

We cannot know if this concept was articulated in the Neolithic era or only put into words and images later. But in any case, the Neolithic way of life did exhibit a definite break from the nomadic hunter-gatherer past when they had lived with nature. For example, the Neolithic domestication of plants and animals showed clearly that humans could and would take control of some plants and animals for their needs.



"The majority of the crops and vegetables of today were domesticated
from their wild progenitors within the past 12,000 years."
(Alseekh, Saleh et al. Domestication of Crop Metabolomes)

Smart Neolithic farmers "domesticated" their plants so that over time the plants produced much greater yields. Also, when possible, they chose aberrant strains of grains that kept their seeds on the stem rather than the normal natural way in which seeds fell off the stem and were blown with the wind. This made harvesting and processing grains much easier.

These last two Neolithic techniques show that Neolithic people had a different mindset than earlier nomadic hunter-gatherers. Neolithic farmers felt that they could 'engineer' nature with their skills, rather than accepting only what nature offered, as they had done when they lived in the wild. This is a clear example of the new way that Neolithic people were thinking.
"Domestication is the process by which farmers select for desirable traits by breeding successive generations of a plant or animal. Over time, a domestic species becomes different from its wild relative.
"Neolithic farmers selected for crops that harvested easily. Wild wheat, for instance, falls to the ground and shatters when it is ripe. Early humans bred for wheat that stayed on the stem for easier harvesting."
-------------------
The Neolithic Era Took Command

While animals had to adapt to the environment as they found it, humans were now attempting to create their own environment that was secure and comfortable.

For the first time in the history of hominins, humans engineered a full environment that was friendly to them. Villages, houses, roads, and fields along with the daily routine of tending the crops and making bread meant that these Neolithic humans had created a space that they could manage. Instead of hunting and gathering, these societies did not have to survive based on what they could forage. 

This way of looking at the world continues to this day in our air-conditioned homes with central heat, our all-weather roads, our all-weather automobiles, and a freezer full of food. 

But don't take my word for it. Here is a summary from a comprehensive study of the Neolithic.
"The Neolithic Revolution was ultimately necessary to the rise of modern civilization by creating the foundation for the later process of industrialization and sustained economic growth."
(Weisdorf, Jacob L. From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution.)
How and why it happened is still not clear. It is part of a heated ongoing debate. Yet we can be certain of one thing: it did happen and we are who we are and live as we do because it did happen.


DIFFERENT KINDS OF TIME
Long-Term Linear Time, Process Time, And Cyclical Time

Neolithic time marked the beginning of our modern concept of time, of long-term linear time, and time that is conceptualized as something that can be controlled. Time could now be planned or managed or used as a resource. Time did not just flow uncontrollably, it could be harnessed and used to human advantage. See my full article about this.

It is important to understand historically how this way of thinking took hold because these ideas have had serious consequences. For example, our ability to engineer our modern environment has led to the climate change crisis.   

It is my view that these Neolithic cultures saw 'big time' or cosmological time as cyclical. Sunrise to sunset, the phases of the moon, winter, spring, summer, fall, birth, and death were all cyclical. But within those cycles, humans could work with long-term linear time.

It is also my opinion that the spiral symbol(s) that appeared throughout the Neolithic era were an expression of that sense of cosmological time.

The famous Tri-Spiral in the chamber at Newgrange.

TOP: The large stone at the entrance to Newgrange
BOTTOM: A drawing of the large stone showing the spiral engravings.
(Coffey, George. Drawings of Newgrange)

For Neolithic people, there would have been many examples of long-term linear time within cyclical time. The seasons occurred in the same order every year. In early spring seeds were planted which then sprouted and grew through the summer and then were harvested in the fall. Agriculture was a process that had to be done in sequence. This was both a linear progression and also a cycle that repeated itself year after year. Preparing the soil, planting, and harvesting had to be done in the correct order and at the right times to ensure a bountiful harvest.

Once Neolithic cultures grasped how this linear time functioned within cyclical time, it opened the door to an understanding of processes in general. 

The spiral was a common symbol used throughout the Neolithic. This pottery is from Romania.
"Ceramics. 5th millennium BC. Cucuteni, (Romania). Museum of Prehistory and Early History, Berlin."


-------------------
Process Time

It appears that Neolithic people had mastered an understanding of processes, what I have called 'process time'. This is linear time that is an integral part of a process.

We know from the continual development of stone tools for millions of years that early hominins could learn, teach and develop processes that became increasingly more complicated. Neolithic people added to that understanding and developed a sophisticated sense of 'process time' which they used to develop and refine several technologies such as pottery and weaving.

Google Word Definition
Process:
-- a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end --

This short definition says it well. A process requires a series of actions under certain conditions in a sequence that must be learned and then executed. And at the same time, the practitioner must have a clear idea of the end result. This, among other things, requires a sense of time and procedure. It also requires planning. In addition, knowledge of a process must be taught to the next generation if the use of the process is to continue.


POTTERY

A good example of this is pottery. It took a long time to develop the right process for making pottery, probably several thousand years, but they eventually figured it out.

LEFT: Cucuteni (a Neolithic Culture) kiln reconstruction 
Art Museum, Piatra Neamt, Romania. The invention of the kiln was as important as the invention of pottery. It allowed high sustained temperatures which later would be modified for the smelting of metals.
RIGHT: A Neolithic (Ubaid) pottery jar in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Dated to about 4500-4000 BCE, it is from Southern Iraq in the Late Ubaid period. 

"Pottery art is a complex and time-consuming process that presupposes a knowledge of all its stages: choice of suitable clay, removal of impurities (manually or by sieving) and clay preparation...and firing at a temperature up to 850-900 Celsius (1562-1652 Fahrenheit)"
(Hellenic Foundation, Neolithic Pottery)

Based on detailed information from the visual-arts-cork.com pottery timeline, virtually all pottery/ceramics fundamentals had been invented in the Neolithic, including tourneys/tournettes which were early potter's wheels (4700 BCE). 
(Visual-Arts-Cork, Pottery Timeline)

Pottery from the Neolithic Ubaid period in the British Museum
Unlike other types of plastic art, pottery was invented then lost, then reinvented then lost again, before finally becoming established around the world during the Neolithic period (c.8000-2000 BCE).
Visual-Arts-Cork. "Pottery Timeline (c.26,000 BCE - 1900)." Encyclopedia Of Art. 
The invention of pottery kilns and their ability to reach high sustained temperatures that had been achieved in the Neolithic era became the foundation for metallurgy which would not have been possible without it. So Neolithic skills also created a critical part of the later metal technology of copper, bronze, and iron over the next several thousand years.

-------------------
More About Process Time

There were many other items and skills that required 'process time' thinking such as making boats out of reeds, for example, or cloth from flax, or houses from reeds, or a wide variety of baskets.

The remarkable quality and sophistication of many late Neolithic technologies means that they had a full understanding of process time.


CONCLUSION
The Domestication of Time

Developing a sense of linear time was critical for the control that Neolithic societies needed. Illusive time was now something that could be managed to some degree. Agriculture required this sense of time on a yearly and monthly basis. And understanding time was also critical to refining the various processes that they worked with, such as pottery. 

They had taken control not only by engineering a new manmade environment but by 'domesticating' time itself.

By the middle of the Neolithic era, the different societies had mastered the basic necessities of life: food, clothing, and shelter. In addition, they had a worldview that they were comfortable with and a new sense of their place and time on this Earth.

I believe this was the start of civilization.


___________________________________
AFTERWORD


WEAVING, TEXTILES AND CLOTHING


Linum usitatissimum (Flax)
One of the founder plants, flax was/is used for fiber, food, fodder, and oil. It was used to make linen, linseed oil, and a variety of other products.

-------------------
Weaving Fabric
The famous Anni Albers of the Bauhaus School had this to say.
"During the 4,500 years or, in some estimates, even 8,000 years that we believe mankind has been weaving, the process itself has been unaffected by the various devices that contributed to greater speed of execution. We still deal in weaving, as at the time of its beginning, with a rigid set of parallel threads in tension and a mobile one that transverses it at right-angles."
This basic insight about right-angles has never been overshadowed. Anni Albers went on to say, "And weaving, even the most elaborate, can be done, given time, with a minimum of equipment...Fabrics of great accuracy have been executed without much mechanical aid."
(Albers, On Weaving)

LEFT: Reconstruction of a Neolithic loom around the time that Otzi, the Neolithic frozen 'ice man' natural mummy, was alive (ca. 3300 BCE), 
RIGHT: Clothing woven by this loom, archeoParc in Schnals, South Tyrol, Italy.
(archeoParc Val Senales - Ötzi Museum) 

"The warp-weighted loom uses a system of holding the warp threads parallel under tension by tying them in small bunches to weights made of stone, pottery or metal. From the beginning of Western history until the Middle Ages, the main weaving tool was this type of loom. LOOM WEIGHTS HAVE BEEN FOUND IN CATALHOYUK, AN ANCIENT CITY IN ANATOLIA THAT DATES TO 7000 BCE, [ED: My emphasis] and use of the warp-weighted loom persists to the present day in part of Norway. Although its particular form has varied through the ages and by locality, its essential parts remained the same.
The loom consists of two vertical uprights, a horizontal warp beam, a shed rod, a heddle rod, and weights. The warp threads are tied to the horizontal beam at the top and hang down vertically towards the ground. The weights, in this case, made of clay, are then attached to the ends of the warp threads, which are then grouped together and tied so that the spun threads don't untwist.
The warp-weighted loom greatly increased weaving efficiency and allowed weavers to create huge, magnificent works and tapestries."
(Smith College, Museum of Ancient Inventions)

 

 -------------------
Making Linen

Filax had to be carefully planted and harvested, next, there were complicated procedures to extract fiber from the flax plant, then the fiber had to be spun into thread and finally woven on a Neolithic loom. The last step was to cut and sew the cloth to make a garment.
5,000 Years Of Making Linen: The History Of Neolithic Flax Processing
"Archaeobotanists Ursula Maier and Helmut Schlichtherle reported evidence of the technological development of making cloth from the flax plant (called linen). [ED: during the Neolithic]
"Making cloth from flax is not a straightforward process.
"Flax is a bast fiber plant--meaning the fiber is collected from the inner bark of the plant--which must undergo a complex set of processes to separate the fiber from the woodier outer parts.
"They report that evidence for Alpine lake house [Neolithic] flax fiber production includes tools (spindles, spindle whorls, hatchets), finished products (nets, textiles, fabrics, even shoes, and hats)...They discovered, amazingly enough, that flax production techniques at these ancient sites were not dissimilar from that used everywhere in the world through the early 20th century."
(Hirst, 5,000 Years of Making Linen)
Click on the next link to see detailed descriptions of the 12 steps that are typically involved in the process of making linen from flax. 


THE NEOLITHIC LEGACY 
TO THE FIRST GREAT CIVILIZATIONS

I have made the point that the great civilizations could not have emerged without the foundation of advanced Neolithic technology. For this reason I believe that civilization started in the Middle Neolithic. Here are two examples of basic Neolithic technologies that were crucial for the rise of the great civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. 

While often overlooked, both the Mesopotamians and the Egyptians depended on huge numbers of woven-fiber sacks for holding and transporting grain. Weaving was perfected in the Neolithic era and made the manufacture of sacks available.


LEFT: Picture from the Sumerian Standard of Ur.
of a person carrying a sack, circa 2600 BCE.
RIGHT: Picture of an Egyptian carrying a sack
from Tombe d'Oumsou, circa 1450 BCE.
Ancient Egyptian model of a granary with scribes.
This model was found in a tomb and shows men delivering grain in woven sacks which is being recorded by scribes.



Building a temple with the best quality fired bricks. The Neolithic domesticated donkeys and the Neolithic double-sided pannier baskets were essential for the construction of buildings in Mesopotamia.

_________________________________
FOOTNOTES

Albers, Anni. On Weaving: New Expanded Edition. Princeton University Press, Oct 24, 2017, page 4.

Alseekh, Saleh et al. Domestication of Crop Metabolomes: Desired and Unintended Consequences. Trends in Plant Science, Volume 26, Issue 6, 2021, Pages 650-661, ISSN 1360-1385.

Antonsen, Kenny & Jimmy. Old Europe - First Civilization 7000-3000 BC. In Danish.

archeoParc Val Senales - Ötzi Museum
Museum based on the Neolithic frozen natural mummy Ötzi, also called The Iceman, who lived between 3350 and 3105 BC in Europe.

Bradley, Richard. The Significance Of Monuments: On the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge, 1998.

Coffey, George. Drawings of Newgrange from the late 1800s. Published in: The Dolmens of Ireland,, by William Copeland Borlase. Published by the University of Michigan Library (January 1, 1897).

Diamond, Jared, UCLA School of Medicine. "The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race" Discover Magazine, May 1987, pp. 64—66.

Hirst, K. Kris. "5,000 Years of Making Linen: The History of Neolithic Flax Processing." Thoughtco.com, May 20, 2019. https://www.thoughtco.com/making-linen-history-neolithic-flax-processing-171347

Irish Art History Section, Professional Development Service for Teachers, P.D.S.T., Ireland.

McClellan, James E. III, Dorn, Harold. Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction, Edition 2.
Johns Hopkins University Press; 2nd edition (April 14, 2006).

Smith College, Museum of Ancient Inventions.
The Warp-Weighted Loom, Worldwide, 7000 BCE
by Kristy Beauchesne, Sun Eoh and Kate McClosky.
Museum of Ancient Inventions
The Virtual Museum of Ancient Inventions 
Smith College, History of Science

Visual-Arts-Cork. "Pottery Timeline (c.26,000 BCE - 1900)." Encyclopedia Of Art. http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/pottery-timeline.htm

Weisdorf, Jacob L. (September 2005). "From Foraging To Farming: Explaining The Neolithic Revolution" (PDF). Journal of Economic Surveys. 19 (4): 561–586. doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00259.x. S2CID 42777045. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 12 June 2023.

Whitrow, Gerald James. Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press. 1988, page 22.


Sunday, January 27, 2019

An Expanded Hypothesis About the Human-Experience-Of-Time

An Expanded Hypothesis
That Relates the History
of the Human-Experience-Of-Time
to Culture, Technology and Belief Systems
in Addition to Language
By Rick Doble
 Creative Commons Copyright

________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

In my last blog, the blog-article before this one (scroll down below this post to read it), I proposed the following hypothesis: As language evolved from the beginning, it developed in tandem with a growing sense of time. In this blog-post, I now want to expand that idea to not only include language but technology, culture and belief systems.


READ MY INITIAL POST 
ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE 
AND THE HUMAN-SENSE-OF-TIME
Toward a Comprehensive Hypothesis 
About the Development of Language and the Human-Sense-Of-Time 
Based in Part on Daniel Everett's 'How Language Began'
OR DOWNLOAD THAT BLOG POST AS A SEPARATE PDF DOCUMENT

In my last blog, I proposed a comprehensive hypothesis that linked the development of human timekeeping with the evolution of language. I believe that most of our conceptions about time are embedded in our language and that our language contains various time-tools that allowed us to work with planning and forecasting at different stages of human development. But each stage was quite different and so, in my hypothesis, the concept of time during the Paleolithic era was quite different from the concept of time during the Neolithic era which, in turn, was different from our modern era.

After seven years of writing this blog, I am now convinced that there were a number of ways that an awareness of time was conceptualized and acted on in the past. Therefore an understanding of this idea can help explain and illuminate the evolution of not only language but society, technology, and belief systems.


Family portrait in Western Culture, 1965.
Family portrait in Western Culture, 1965.

Like the demands of the environment, humans had to learn to work with time to gain the greatest survival advantage. Time in many ways is like any environmental condition or resource. It is one thing to know which fish can be eaten in certain parts of the river, but it is another thing to know when is the best time to catch those fish. A proper understanding of time could produce bountiful catches of fish, for example, or allow the complicated planning needed for a hunt of large animals during migration seasons. 

Then later large complex civilizations such as Babylonia, four thousand years ago, needed a completely different understanding of time to organize their cities, their officials and their armies. They were the first to measure time carefully and divide it into hours and minutes. 

This means that the way people worked with and understood time was quite different in each era.


A portrait of a family in the Sami nomadic culture around 1900.
A portrait of a family in the Sami nomadic culture around 1900.

While language contained/contains the basic concepts about time, the customs and rituals of the civilization, the technology, and the belief systems reflected/reflect the sense of time that was/is in place during each era. They, in turn, also affected/affect concepts and ideas about time in the language.



________________________________________

THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF TIME

As I have discussed in this blog there are three kinds of time or three dimensions of time. 

#1. There is momentary time which is the fundamental aspect of time. Everything that exists exists in the moment or did exist in the moment or will exist in the moment.

#2. There is cyclical time such as morning to morning, Saturday to Saturday, month to month and year to year. In addition, there is cyclical time in terms of a culture, such as birth, procreation, and death. These also repeat but with new individuals.

#3. And third, there is linear time which only goes forward. In our modern society linear time has been emphasized due to the 'progress' of science which keeps building on past achievements to make new breakthroughs. And in our societies, we teach our young from an early age to get an education which forms the foundation for building a career.

All three dimensions of time are always present, whether an organism is aware of them or not. For example, while deer might live in the moment and be aware of cyclical changes in the daylight or changes in the seasons, they are not aware of linear time. Humans are the only animals that can state 'when' something happened in the past or conceptualize 'when' something will happen in the future. Yet an individual deer is subject to the ravages of linear time, i.e., birth, mating, death, nevertheless. For more about this read: William Roberts, Are Animals Stuck in Time?

These three dimensions of time have always been a part of the human culture but one dimension has often been stressed over another during various periods of human history. And this changing emphasis did not necessarily progress from the first dimension to the last. For example, the Middle Ages emphasized cyclical time whereas the Romans before them had emphasized linear time. 

And even in a particular era, some professions emphasize one aspect of time over another. Individual personalities often favor one dimension over another. A successful actor told me once that he had always been a grasshopper instead of an ant, referring to the famous story of the grasshopper who played while the sun shone in the summer and the ant that stored food for the winter. But being a grasshopper was quite appropriate for him because as an actor he needed to be in the moment when he was acting.

Also, one individual or endeavor can involve all three dimensions at the same time. A painter, for example, could enjoy painting at a regular time each afternoon (cyclical time), and enjoy the momentary pleasure of painting, while at the same time hoping that their work would get better and reach a larger audience over the years (linear time).

It is also important to note that linear cultures will have time periods and holidays when momentary time or cyclical time is quite important and that appropriate behavior is expected of everyone. Even though the United States is a linear time culture, a person watching an important basketball game is expected to be totally wrapped up in the moment-to-moment activity of the game. At Christmas, a cyclical festival, everyone is expected to put a tree inside their home, decorate it, give presents and then attend a family dinner on Christmas day. 

The following very brief outline and overview of different cultures throughout history illustrates how culture, technology and belief systems along with language may have developed and used their concepts of time.



________________________________________

MOMENTARY TIME: 
THE PIRAHA LANGUAGE, CULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY

I have written at length about the Piraha tribe in the Amazon who adhere to an Immediacy of Experience Principle according to linguist Dr. Daniel Everett. Their time frame and concepts are built around the moment. This is integral to their language but also to their culture and their technology. Please read this blog for more about them. 
https://deconstructingtime.blogspot.com/2018/11/comprehensive-hypothesis-human-sense-of-time.html

The Piraha language may be an ancient and early kind of language according to Dr.  Everett. There is no other language on Earth like it. It is spoken by a people whose roots go back perhaps thousands of years as hunter-gatherers in the Amazon. So it is possible, as I have hypothesized in my earlier blog, that other early cultures such as Paleolithic societies and their languages were present-oriented and they operated primarily in the moment.

The few vowels and phonemes of the Piraha language make this one of the simplest known languages which is why Dan Everett decided it was an earlier form of language, a G2 language as he called it, rather than a G3 modern language. However, it would be a mistake to think of it as 'primitive'. Until Dan came along no one from the outside was able to master it, demonstrating how unusual the language is. In addition, it contains a number of features that do not exist in modern languages but are essential for these hunter-gatherers. For example, it can be sung while in the Amazon forest, which is a way for members of the tribe to keep track of each other over a distance. And the Immediacy of Experience Principle, as Dan calls it, means that there are 65,000 possible combinations of indicators that can be added to a verb stem. These indicators give precise information about the direct knowledge a speaker has. As Dan points out it does the job quite well for this hunter-gatherer culture.


HOW LANGUAGE BEGAN 
AND THE HUMAN UNDERSTANDING OF TIME
Daniel Everett's New Theories About The Evolution Of Language 

A photo of a Piraha tribe (above) and the Amazon jungle where they live (bottom)
A photo of a Piraha tribe (above) and the Amazon jungle where they live (bottom)
A person who carefully studied the Piraha language wrote: "To the verb stem are appended up to 15 potential slots for morphological markers that encode aspectual notions such as whether events were witnessed, whether the speaker is certain of its occurrence, whether it is desired, whether it was proximal or distal, and so on. None of the markers encode features such as person, number, tense or gender."
Gordon, Peter. Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia
"Pirahã also uses suffixes that communicate evidentiality, a category lacking in English grammar. One such suffix, -xáagahá, means that the speaker actually observed the event in question."

But just as important as the language is the culture and the technology of the Piraha. When Dan Everett, who studied the Piraha for thirty years, brought up ideas that could not be verified or he talked about people he had never met, the Piraha were not interested because their culture required verification. When he asked them what the Amazon jungle was like thousands of years ago, they said it had always been the way it is now -- not believing in any long term past. And their belief system did not have a creation myth either.

The Piraha eat what they catch in the river and gather in the jungle and are quite good at doing this on a day to day basis. While they could preserve food for future use, Dan found they were not interested, even though there were days when they went hungry.

My point is that in addition to the language, the culture rejected any mention of time beyond the Piraha's accepted concepts and this was part of their technology -- as they were not interested in expanding their skills to include longer planning. And they were not interested in considering a creation story or mythology about the past -- the Amazon jungle had always been there just as it is right now. 


________________________________________

CYCLICAL TIME: 
THE NEOLITHIC ERA


Map of Neolithic monuments in Malta, some of which   can accurately indicate the day of the seasonal equinoxes and solstices.
Map of Neolithic monuments in Malta, some of which 
can accurately indicate the day of the seasonal equinoxes and solstices. 

While we cannot know the language of the Neolithic period or even their beliefs, we can take an educated guess about their timekeeping. In the last half century it has become clear -- from the passage tomb in Newgrange in Ireland to the Goseck circle in Germany (along with hundreds of other such circles in northern Europe) down to solar aligned monuments in Malta --  that keeping seasonal time was very important to Neolithic societies. All of these  structures could determine the winter solstice with remarkable accuracy, for example.

It is likely that they needed to know the exact yearly time because their farming technology depended on it. It also appears likely that the many buildings they built, which could indicate the time, were also considered sacred and served a religious purpose. So their concept of time and their religion were closely intertwined.
Experts now believe that megaliths stood at the very heart of ritual practice for the networks of communities scattered across western Europe later in the New Stone Age, or Neolithic period, that had begun around 10,000 B.C. Their function was both Earthly and celestial: a focus for rites concerning the movement of the heavenly bodies across the skies, a memorial to the community’s ancestors, and an awe-inspiring site to cement local loyalty and solidarity. The incorporation of astronomical alignments suggests that neolithic ceremonies were closely bound with the changing seasons. These cycles were critical to agrarian communities, whose leaders would benefit from this essential knowledge.
Michael J. Gantley, Europe’s Mighty Megaliths "Rock" the Winter Solstice, National Geographic https://www.nationalgeographic.com/archaeology-and-history/magazine/2017/11-12/history-europe-megaliths-solstice/
Later in the Middle Ages this sense of seasonal cyclical time would return but with the added instrument of the clock.



________________________________________

THE BEGINNING OF LINEAR TIME: 
THE BABYLONIAN CULTURE, SCIENCE AND BELIEF SYSTEM


The star, top left, was the symbol for the goddess Ishtar -- see her picture next. 
"(1186–1172 BCE): The king presents his daughter to the goddess Nannaya. 
The crescent moon represents the god Sin, the sun the Shamash and the star the goddess Ishtar." 

The sacred, powerful and central Babylonian goddess Ishtar.   Her symbol was the star and she was associated with the planet Venus.  " 'Burney Relief' ...from about 1800-1750 BC."
The sacred, powerful and central Babylonian goddess Ishtar. 
Her symbol was the star and she was associated with the planet Venus.
" 'Burney Relief' ...from about 1800-1750 BC."

In a sense the Babylonian empire invented modern time. As one of the first large empires and bureaucracies in the West, it needed to manage time on a daily basis in a systematic and orderly fashion. Managing such a far-flung empire with millions of people would have been very difficult otherwise.

So beginning in the 14th century BCE the Babylonians invented hours and minutes -- the same we use for timekeeping today. They also invented 360 degrees for a circle with (a math system based on twelve) which they projected onto the sky and which they then used to tell time. Many of their notions about time were derived from astronomy. And their astronomy -- which they knew was the most accurate timekeeper -- was quite sophisticated. Their division of the sky into 360 degrees is still used today, virtually unchanged from Babylonian days. 
The Babylonian GU text arranges stars in 'strings' that lie along declination circles [ED: i.e., the circular positions of stars according to the Babylonian 360 degree conception of the sky] and thus measure right-ascensions or time-intervals, and also employs the stars of the zenith, which are also separated by given right-ascensional differences.

Babylonian astronomy was the basis for much of what was done in ancient Greek astronomy, in classical Indian astronomy, in Sasanian, Byzantine and Syrian astronomy, astronomy in the medieval Islamic world, and in Central Asian and Western European astronomy. Neo-Babylonian astronomy can thus be considered the direct predecessor of much of ancient Greek mathematics and astronomy, which in turn is the historical predecessor of the European (Western) scientific revolution.     

But there is more: Astronomy and their belief system were one and the same. They had an objective and precise mathematical way of measuring the movement of the stars and planets including accurate predictions of eclipses (the Saros Cycle) and the Metonic 19-year cycle that reconciled the Moon's cycles with the yearly Sun cycles. Yet at the same time, they believed the planets were gods and their changing alignment in the stars of the Zodiac affected our worldly domain -- an idea which is still alive in astrology today. In other words, their concept of time, their civilization, their technology, and their belief system were intertwined. The men who studied the stars and planets held an elevated position in Babylonian society and were known as astronomer-priests, showing the close connection between science and religion at that time.
During the 8th and 7th centuries BCE, Babylonian astronomers developed a new approach to astronomy. They began studying philosophy [ED: the original term for science was natural philosophy] dealing with the ideal nature of the ... universe and began employing an internal logic within their predictive planetary systems. ... [S]ome scholars have thus referred to this new approach as the first scientific revolution. 


Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa (
"The Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa (Enuma Anu Enlil Tablet 63) refers to the record of astronomical observations of Venus, as preserved in numerous cuneiform tablets dating from the first millennium BCE. It is believed that this astronomical record was first compiled during the reign of King Ammisaduqa (or Ammizaduga), the fourth ruler after Hammurabi. Thus, the origins of this text should probably be dated to around the mid-seventeenth century BCE. (according to the Middle Chronology). The tablet recorded the rise times of Venus and its first and last visibility on the horizon before or after sunrise and sunset (the heliacal risings and settings of Venus) in the form of lunar dates. These observations are recorded for a period of 21 years."


________________________________________

THE MIDDLE AGES: 
SACRED CYCLICAL CLOCK TIME

After the classical linear-time era of Rome, a complex sophisticated machine was developed in the Middle Ages to tell time. It was known as the clock. 

In the first book of the Bible (a sacred text to Christians, Jews, and Muslims), in Genesis 1:14, (Common English Bible): God said, "Let there be lights in the dome of the sky to separate the day from the night. They will mark events, sacred seasons, days, and years." Since this occurred on the fourth day of creation, it was clear that timekeeping was an important part of the world God had made and it was an important duty for humans to keep track of time. Therefore to Jews, Muslims and Christians an understanding of time was given to them by God who expected them to carefully follow the progression of the stars and thus honor God at sacred times.

The invention of the clock was originally part of that sacred understanding. This machine was based on the movement of the stars, the moon, the sun, and the planets -- using the perfect circles and epicycles of the geocentric (Earth-centered) astronomy of Ptolemy. The heavens were seen as God-given and sacred. The clock reflected that spiritual belief. 


The seasonal cyclical panels from Les Tres Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, ca. 1400.
The seasonal cyclical panels from Les Tres Riches Heures du Duc de Berry, ca. 1400.

So the clock was first used in monasteries to provide an accurate way to regulate the activities of monks. The clock, in the beginning, was about cyclical repeating time as was the era of the Middle Ages. Soon clocks were everywhere in Europe but they often showed not just the time but the position of the heavenly bodies. Humans had now, in a sense, made a copy of God's handiwork and brought it down to Earth. The round clock symbolized the repeating and cyclical nature of time. 
Mechanical clocks became widespread in the 14th century when they were used in medieval monasteries to keep the regulated schedule of prayers. The earliest medieval European clockmakers were Catholic monks. Medieval religious institutions required clocks because they regulated daily prayer- and work-schedules strictly, using various types of time-telling and recording devices   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_timekeeping_devices
Most of the first clocks were not so much chronometers as exhibitions of the pattern of the cosmos ... Clearly the origins of the mechanical clock lie in a complex realm of monumental planetariums... 
White, Lynn Jr. (1966). Medieval Technology and Social Change.

So, in this case, an advance in technology did not lead to a more complex dimension in time, i.e. linear time, time which had characterized the Roman empire, but instead revived cyclical time which had characterized farming communities in the Neolithic era. 

Yet all three dimensions of time are always present. While the activities of monks were centered around cyclical time, each monk, in a sense, also lived in a kind of spiritual linear time in which he hoped he would come closer to god.


NOTE: We live in a linear age of complex technological urban civilizations. For this reason, the Middle Ages has often been seen as the Dark Ages when not much was developed or advanced -- an era when human innovation was stymied. Clearly, this is the prejudice of one culture in linear time looking at another culture in cyclical time. In any case, the Middle Ages brought about many worthwhile things, things that are very important to our modern societies. And not surprisingly these 'things' are more of a spiritual nature or a romantic nature. The idea of a "knight in shining armor" and the code of chivalry, a magic castle as in Disney World, the stunning cathedrals that have lasted as long as a thousand years, and perhaps most importantly the belief in romantic love are all from that era. 

As I said during the Middle Ages, the first mechanical clocks were invented based on a sacred geometry of the heavens. Then these clocks were perfected. And it was these clocks that would be central to the later development of manufacturing in the Industrial Revolution. It is also interesting to note that in England alone there were about 6000 water mills in the 11th Century and these mills were used for a variety of purposes. There were gristmills, sawmills, textile mills, rolling mills, and wire drawing mills. These mills along with the gearing of the clock would later form the basis for the Industrial Revolution. 

How the Discredited Geocentric Cosmos
Was a Critical Component of the Scientific Revolution


CATHEDRAL THINKING

Perhaps the most important contribution of the Middle Ages to our current age is the concept of Cathedral Thinking. This concept has now become very relevant as we face the consequences of industrial development which may lead to climate change and yet not be felt for a hundred years or so. 

Cathedral thinking is about the work and the time required to build a great cathedral. In the past many of the workers never saw their work completed and did not expect to. Nevertheless, they were committed to the grand vision of building a magnificent cathedral which became a source of pride to the local community and provided an experience of reverence for the faithful. The work of the builders was seen as an expression of devotion to their spiritual beliefs. 

An example is the York Minster Cathedral in England which was built from 1220 to 1472 or more than 250 years. While other cathedrals did not take this long to build, a hundred years or so for their construction was not unusual. 

Today, as I write, there is another such example, the remarkable Sagrada Família (Church of the Holy Family) in Barcelona Spain which was designed by the innovative architect Antoni Gaudí and begun in 1886. It is still under construction and will not be finished until 2026.


Gaudi's Sagrada Família (Church of the Holy Family) in Barcelona Spain   which has taken more than a century to build and will not be completed until 2026.
Gaudi's Sagrada Família (Church of the Holy Family) in Barcelona Spain 
which has taken more than a century to build and will not be completed until 2026.

CATHEDRAL THINKING IN TODAY'S HI-TECH WORLD
A modern-day CEO of a major corporation, Jim Rogers, CEO of Duke Energy, had this to say. The following was paraphrased from a speech he gave. Modern-day cathedral thinking is about,"the care and commitment of people who contributed to building the cathedral... Its implications on vision and strategy development seemed to be about their outcome, a recognition that the successful implementation of the strategy may not be measured until long after it's authors have moved on. More specifically, Rogers was looking at the influences and impacts of energy on the environment, noting that climate change is not immediate and that policies and practices put in place today will have their benefits measured only decades from now.This article went on to say"Key considerations ... are intentionality and responsibility. In one aspect, “cathedral thinking” is a bit of hubris, a call to imagine and believe in the grandeur of our pursuit and to equate it with the divine. Another aspect is the call to mindfulness of the future in all that we do, evoking a certain humility and humanness in what we do."  https://cathedralthinking.com/thinkers-cathedral-thinking/


________________________________________

THE BEGINNING OF MODERN LINEAR TIME:
THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION

Starting with Galileo around 1600 CE modern science came into its own. It is important to note that time and timing was critical to this new science. Galileo's formulas for gravity and the acceleration of a falling body were the first scientific formulas to include a complex understanding of time as a factor.

Measure what is measurable, and make measurable what is not so.
Galileo Galilei 

Galileo realized he needed to know how to measure time accurately. Legend has it that one day during a church service he saw a lamp swinging back and forth, a lamp that was on a long cord that dropped down from the ceiling. As he observed it, he thought he saw a regular pattern. Using his pulse for timing, he was able to determine that each swing of the lamp took the same amount of time. This later became the basis for incredibly accurate clocks.

While clocks had been constructed for about 300 years prior to Galileo, measuring time precisely second to second had not been that accurate. Galileo made this an important part of his life's work and was able, through a variety of experiments, to confirm that a falling body increased its acceleration (i.e. time squared) second to second.

Free Falling Object. 
The value of g [ED: gravity] is 9.8 meters per square second on the surface of the earth...An object that moves because of the action of gravity alone is said to be free falling.
Free Falling Object - Glenn Research Center - NASA

Later the formulas of Isaac Newton incorporated Galileo's ideas and used time in the mathematics of calculus. So a key to the scientific revolution was a scientific and mathematical understanding of time that could then be calculated and used to build machinery.

When Newton discovered the laws of gravity and how the heavenly bodies moved, God began to be thought of differently. He was now seen as the "Great Watch Maker" because the objects in the sky moved in mathematical precision over time just like a mechanical clock.

Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe.
Galileo Galilei 

In addition, modern calculus, which Newton invented along with Leibniz, had now incorporated time into an understanding of how the universe operated. Calculus is defined as "the mathematical study of continuous change" (Calculus - Wikipedia) and continuous change occurs over time. Much of calculus is about the mathematical study of time -- which was key to the Industrial Revolution as machines operated very much like clocks and their repetitive sequential motions were at the heart of their ability to produce.


Calculus graphic


Isaac Newton And Linear Time

A specific formulation of linear time began with Isaac Newton who maintained that there was an absolute time in the Universe that continued in a line, like an arrow, from past to present to future. This was an objective reality that was independent of our human existence and our perception. Newton's linear time was important because his calculations needed linear time to work properly. This was also considered the time that God had put in place when He created the Universe. Although it began as a scientific principle, it eventually became part of the common conception of time.



________________________________________

SCIENTIFIC-INDUSTRIAL LINEAR TIME:
MODERN-DAY TIME IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES


Composite night shot of electric lighting in the United States in the eastern states.
Composite night shot of electric lighting in the United States in the eastern states.

Modern time is decidedly linear. Because we are in a scientific age with significant technological innovations, we know that new discoveries built on old knowledge are the order of the day. Technology is changing rapidly, so rapidly you can be sure that when you buy the latest cell phone it will be out of date in a couple of months or a year at the most.

Science and technology and mass production and manufacturing have given us the modern world with all of its benefits and shortcomings. Yet with linear time in a fast-changing society, we are often discontented. Our consumer society fosters dissatisfaction -- we could own a better car or a bigger house, for example.

Perhaps the best example of modern linear time is the invention of the moving assembly line. In one stroke early automaker Henry Ford translated the "time is money" concept into a workable system which would be copied and modified to make everything from airplanes to doughnuts today.

In 1913 Henry Ford implemented the first moving assembly line. The increase in production and the reduction in cost was dramatic. Before his assembly line, it had taken twelve hours to assemble a car but now it took only two and a half hours. At the beginning of 1913 the Ford plant was turning out 100 Model-Ts a day, by the end, it was turning out 1000 Model-Ts a day. But there was more, much more to this idea. Because the assembly line had simplified the job of installing parts into a car, it did not require highly skilled workers. Instead, Ford needed reliable workers who showed up on time and who did what they were told. And he was able to get just the people he wanted because he paid them much more than the going wage. In other words, Ford's idea was a total concept: dramatically decrease the time it took to assemble a car, pay workers well, and reduce the price of a car. By understanding the dynamics of linear time Ford did all three and in many ways invented the modern industrial world of mass production we live in today.

The downside of Ford's vision was that the work was demanding and repetitive. Many workers could not handle the strain and quit. Work was no longer creative or fulfilling but simply a long extended chore that had to be accomplished. The work had little meaning for the workers and it changed the relationship between workers and the work they did.

This is the legacy of modern technology and it forms much of the world we now live in and the way we think about time.


________________________________________

THE INDIVIDUAL AND MODERN LINEAR TIME 

The mid-life crisis is a good example of the psychological cost of linear time. A psychologist schooled in "the human experience of time" might approach a particular mid-life crisis from the point of view of different expectations about time and also a better way of relating to time.

The mid-life crisis problem:
First: The problem is that the person has not gotten ahead, should be further along, is lagging behind, is not high enough on the ladder of professional success and this is the source of anxiety. 
Second: There is a conflict with the regular daily, weekly, monthly, yearly demands of a family, a marriage, children, friendships, activities. These concerns are more about cyclical time and repeating time than linear time. Yet in many ways, cyclical time may be more important. 

Part of solving the problem may come down to defining success: Which is more important? A good marriage or a successful climb up the career ladder. And while being successful is a worthy goal, the cost of that success needs to be taken into account. For example, does the work on a daily basis give the patient satisfaction? The work one does each day should have meaning and some level of enjoyment. As a friend of mine, Dave Canalos, used to say "The quality of the day" matters. Also is there a way to reconcile the demands of a job with the personal demands of an individual's life?

In this kind of therapy, a patient would learn about the different dimensions of time as it related to her or his situation. So an understanding of momentary time, cyclical time and linear time would be used to bring the patient into better harmony with his or her lifestyle. Rhythm would also be a key element. 


Traffic frustration in the modern world of grid-lock.
Traffic frustration in the modern world of grid-lock.

For example, a professor I knew who worked at a stressful job at a major university, would immediately dig in his garden after work so that he could unwind. The contact with dirt and natural plants helped him restore his own natural rhythm.

In the modern Industrial world, time is man-made. Rather than noticing the position of the sun we notice numbers on a clock. Time has now become quite abstract and yet is no less stern as a taskmaster. With billions of people on the Earth and most living in an urban environment, a precise way to measure and synchronize time is essential for societies to operate effectively and efficiently. This has also allowed us to build a complex man-made industrial world that has brought us the benefits of a much longer life span and creature comforts such as air conditioning and automobiles. Yet it has also created problems of a widespread sense of alienation among many young people. In a recent study, a pervasive feeling of loneliness and isolation was felt in almost half of the people in the US, for example. 

While we think in linear terms in our consumer age, we also treat time as a commodity because of our consumer culture. We can "save" time, or "spend" time or "waste" time or "set aside" time or even "invest" time. This point of view comes directly from our way of thinking due to our modern consumer culture. But it would not make sense to a hunter-gatherer or a Neolithic farmer.


Frustrated man
Despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage
Bullet With Butterfly Wings
The Smashing Pumpkins

My wife tells the story of a teacher who pointed to a round circular clock and asked her students to work until a certain time. The only problem was that the students did not know how to read the clock. They were only familiar with numbers for hours and minutes that progressed in a linear fashion as on a cell phone.

Here is a good example of how technology has affected our understanding of time. Consider the phrase, "recorded live." While this does not seem strange to us, imagine trying to explain this concept to a person a hundred and fifty years ago. 

Some people have trouble accepting that there could be quite different concepts of time in the past that are dissimilar from the modern world. However, in our modern world, it is not problematic to talk about quality time and dead time. The idea of quality time has become so important in our mechanistic age where everything has been reduced to mundane numbers, there is now an abbreviation everyone understands, i.e., QT for quality time.


There is a saying in the US: A bad day fishing is better than a good day at work. 
IT MEANS
Having free time, even if it is not a good experience, is better than a joy you may have at work? 
aiyu Senior Member

Everyone understands what this means: The passage of time is quite different being on or near the water with a fishing rod in your hand with no deadline or person telling you what to do vs. sitting at your desk at work. A search of the Internet yielded hundreds of times this saying was quoted along with a full range of t-shirts and even coffee cups with those words. 
https://www.teepublic.com/t-shirt/3249599-a-bad-day-of-fishing-is-better-than-a-good-day-at-


SUPERTRAMP LOGICAL SONG
Songwriters: Richard Davies / Roger Hodgson
When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful
A miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical ...
But then they send me away to teach me how to be sensible
Logical,.. Oh clinical, oh intellectual, cynical...
Won't you please, please tell me what we've learned
I know it sounds absurd
Please tell me who I am



________________________________________

CONCLUSION

My point here is quite simple.
Time permeates everything. However, humans can conceptualize time and use time in quite different ways. I went into some detail about this in my earlier comprehensive hypothesis about language and time. And the same basic idea of time, as a key component but with different characteristics, applies to cultures, and technologies and belief systems. 

This means that a larger comprehensive hypothesis about time should also include the development and evolution of civilizations, societies, and cultures along with their technology and their spiritual beliefs.

I realize this is a tall order. But if past societies and eras are looked at in terms of time, we might gain a better understanding of our own time and our own situation.

Also if there is any lesson to be learned, it is that Cathedral Thinking is what is needed today. We must learn to think a hundred or more years into the future, even though we will never see that future. 



________________________________________

AFTERWORD

SCIENCE VS. RELIGION?

Until about one hundred and fifty years ago, science and religion were closely intertwined. Astronomy, in particular, was the first exact science. The study of astronomy led to a precise understanding of time but the heavenly bodies were also assumed to be part of the supernatural. 

Isaac Newton was an alchemist in addition to working out the laws of physics. It is also clear that Neolithic societies were able to create accurate instruments that indicated when the winter solstice occurred, but at the same time, these societies saw the seasonal movement of the sun in mythological terms. 

However, starting with perhaps Darwin, science began to separate from religion. So in our scientific age, we often dismiss mythical concepts as superstitious. 
Nevertheless, in a sense, we are still linked to earlier belief systems because the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are named for Greco-Roman gods.
Even today, religious and mythical ideas have influenced science and led to some major breakthroughs, such as the concept of the Big Bang (the beginning of time) which was formulated by a Jesuit priest, Georges Lemaître. He, nevertheless, made it clear to those in the church that he did not want his science to become part of Catholic dogma. 


All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. 
Albert Einstein